IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i9d10.1007_s10668-023-04144-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mergers as an alternative for energy use optimization: evidence from the cucumber greenhouse production using the Inverse DEA approach

Author

Listed:
  • Amar Oukil

    (Sultan Qaboos University)

  • Ahmed Amin Soltani

    (University of M’sila)

  • Nawal Al-Mezeini

    (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries & Water Resources, Directorate General of Agriculture & Livestock Research)

  • Abdulrahim Al-Ismaili

    (Sultan Qaboos University)

  • Ahmed Nourani

    (Scientific and Technical Research Center On Arid Regions (CRSTRA))

Abstract

This paper investigates the merits of Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A), as strategic decisions, in optimizing energy use. The impact of M&A decisions on reducing energy consumption and, as a result, GHG emissions, are evaluated through the inverse data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Moreover, a new index, identified as synergy merge index (SMI), is developed to measure the merger’s synergetic effect and determine accordingly the most productive merger plan. Although the proposed methodology could be applied in any sector where energy use optimization is of interest, the investigations were carried out in the greenhouse (GH) production through a sample of 30 GH farms from Al-Batinah region, Oman. The standard DEA model declared 40% of the GH farms efficient, with an average technical efficiency of 0.872, yet, the inverse DEA results revealed that nearly 45% of the productive mergers involve at least one efficient GH farm, i.e., energy gains are still possible even if the merging farms are presumably efficient. The post-merger GH farms showed a substantial potential for energy gains, ranging between 17.56 and 74.47%, on average, with the most significant proportions observed for electricity. The highest notable proportions of energy gains reached 81.26%, 78.13%, 89.74%, 75.60%, 90.36%, and 77.41% for fertilizers, machinery, water chemicals, electricity, and labor, respectively. The most productive merger plan revealed that GH farm mergers farms can improve the energy savings by a factor of more than 4, where the share of electricity represents alone 94.92%, followed by 3.83% for fertilizers and only 0.60% for water. These findings unequivocally demonstrate that mergers can have a considerable impact on enhancing energy efficiency, which, along the way, provides strong support for the implementation of local policies that endorse mergers as a viable strategy to achieving optimal energy utilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Amar Oukil & Ahmed Amin Soltani & Nawal Al-Mezeini & Abdulrahim Al-Ismaili & Ahmed Nourani, 2025. "Mergers as an alternative for energy use optimization: evidence from the cucumber greenhouse production using the Inverse DEA approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(9), pages 21075-21100, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04144-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04144-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-04144-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-04144-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04144-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.