IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i9d10.1007_s10668-022-02609-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An extended approach using failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) and weighting method for assessment of risk factors in the petrochemical industry

Author

Listed:
  • Sina Enayati Fatollah

    (Urmia University of Engineering)

  • Rahim Dabbagh

    (Urmia University of Engineering)

  • Amir Shahsavar Jalavat

    (West Azarbaijan Industrial Management Institute)

Abstract

Determining the share of project cost progress is among the essential issues in the planning phases of financial management and earned value management (EVM). The performance baseline is set up in the planning phase to measure cost deviations during project execution. Then, an estimate at completion (EAC) is forecasted based on the current cost progress. Traditionally, EVM only focuses on the cost performance index (CPI) and does not address other important aspects, such as complexity and risk, which are critical for all organizational stakeholders. In most cases, the cost factor is used to determine the percentage of the project’s financial progress. Despite its superior formulation, EVM forecasts are still influenced by project risks and uncertainties. These factors lead to inconsistency between EAC results obtained through standard formulae. In this study, a framework was developed in which a relatively complete set of criteria has been evaluated and ranked to improve cost progress estimation. Such criteria can be used in the proposed multi-criteria decision-making technique for activities related to peroxide project operations. Expert opinions in several groups have been collected using the group decision-making method. The risk of activities was identified using the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method. In addition, the rank of activities was determined by the Multi-Objective Optimization based on Ratio Analysis based on G-number theory (G-MOORA) method with an uncertainty approach. Linguistic indicators of importance and necessity in the decision matrix G were fuzzified through triangular numbers. In the next step, these values were normalized to definite numbers, and the cost progress of the project was calculated. The output is a table proposing fixed weights, indicating that adding weighting dimensions changes the calculation of the project cost percentage of progress for well-known activities that can be widely used in construction and installation projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Sina Enayati Fatollah & Rahim Dabbagh & Amir Shahsavar Jalavat, 2025. "An extended approach using failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) and weighting method for assessment of risk factors in the petrochemical industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(9), pages 22263-22288, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02609-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02609-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02609-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02609-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02609-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.