Author
Listed:
- Michelle Bonatti
(Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF E. V)
Humboldt University of Berlin)
- Carla Erismann
(Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF E. V)
Humboldt University of Berlin)
- Ayna Askhabalieva
(Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF E. V))
- Juliano Borba
(Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF E. V))
- Kamila Pope
(Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF E. V))
- Renata Reynaldo
(Federal University of Rio de, Janeiro)
- Luca Eufemia
(Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF E. V)
Humboldt University of Berlin)
- Ana Paula Turetta
(Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA Soils)
Federal Rural University of Rio de, Janeiro)
- Stefan Sieber
(Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF E. V)
Humboldt University of Berlin)
Abstract
In neglected communities, waste and organic residues are not only a vector of several problems, like diseases and water pollution, but also a contributor to increasing forms of vulnerability and marginalization. At the same time, these communities also have presented innovative local initiatives and transformative learning about natural resources management that can be a vehicle for achieving more sustainable food systems. In the south of Brazil, community-based organic residue management has shown an extraordinary potential to improve food security and livelihoods for (≈1600) community members of a vulnerable urban territory. In this context, the overall objective of this article is (a) To better understand what Social Learning (SL) processes related to successful organic residues management in neglected communities exist and (b) To identify what knowledge systems are created in one empirical case. The study case is based on a communitarian waste management project, the Bucket Revolution Project (BRP). The analytical framework builds upon social learning theory and its triple-loop process focusing on four specific phenomena. The applied mixed-methods approach was made in four steps: 1. a focus group to investigate collective community issues; 2. semi-structured interviews to investigate specific and individual issues in the context of the BRP; 3. social media analysis to better understand the BRP narratives; and finally 4. participant observation in community and institutional meetings. Mainly using MaxQda software and coding indicators of SL, the data show that “Diversity of knowledge integration” is the most identified SL indicator in the interviews (52%). For BRP, identity development, community conditions improvement, and environment understanding are three key components of the knowledge system enhanced through an underlying process of social learning. Furthermore, the study also shows that there are endogenous and exogenous social learning processes at work.
Suggested Citation
Michelle Bonatti & Carla Erismann & Ayna Askhabalieva & Juliano Borba & Kamila Pope & Renata Reynaldo & Luca Eufemia & Ana Paula Turetta & Stefan Sieber, 2025.
"Social learning as an underlying mechanism for sustainability in neglected communities: The Brazilian case of the Bucket Revolution project,"
Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(9), pages 20433-20451, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02167-z
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02167-z
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02167-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.