Author
Abstract
The present study reports a simple all microbial-based consolidated bioprocess for the conversion of poplar parings into ethanol. The bacterium Bacillus cereus G9241 CP 026,376 and the yeast Candida tropicalis MF 289,181 were employed for this purpose. Potential of the cellulolytic B. cereus for saccharification of the substrate and bioethanol fermentation was unveiled by employing the separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) as well as simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) processes. The bacterium as well as yeast grew well in the 2% substrate hydrolyzate and the cell counts reached up to 19,701 × 107 and 852 × 106/ml at 96 h, respectively. For the bacterially fermented saccharified substrate, the HMF content reduced from 489 ± 38.1 µg/L at 24 h to 232 µg/L (52.56%) at 96 h. In case of the yeast fermented poplar hydrolyzate, the HMF content dropped down to 351.3 ± 48.6 µg/L right at first sampling point and thereafter became un-detectable. In case of SSF, HMF could appear only at 72 and 96 h of fermentation with respective values of 260.3 ± 25.8 and 243 ± 8.66 µg/L. Acetic acid content among the differently fermented substrates ranged from 460 ± 230 to 5360 ± 503 mg/L. The bacterial cellulases yielded up to 6.742 and 8.561 mg/ml of glucose and xylose of 2% substrate, respectively. In case of yeast monoculture, the glucose and xylose contents reduced down to 34.17% and 85.28%, respectively, at 24 h post-inoculation with concomitant ethanol production of 634 ± 159 mg/L. Following 24 h of co-culturing of the microbes in the substrate hydrolyzate, the glucose and xylose reduced down to 39.69% and 82%, respectively, with accompanying ethanol level of 501.38 ± 46.7 mg/L. Glucose content of 24 h incubated SSF fluids was 1568 ± 226 mg/L, whereas the xylose remained non-detectable throughout the study period. Ethanol productions at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of incubations for the SSF experiment were 140.43 ± 44.8, 60.18 ± 13.5, 177.78 ± 23.9 and 83.48 ± 10.3 mg/L, respectively. The simple experiments reported here provide a workable model to assess the potential of suitable microbes for bioethanol production from plants’ biowastes by a consolidated bioprocess without any drastic pretreatment.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02143-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.