IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i8d10.1007_s10668-024-04724-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reassessment of the efficiency of China's industrial circular economy considering quality of life: a meta recycle SBM dynamic under exogenous model

Author

Listed:
  • Anqi Lei

    (Ningxia University)

  • Li Yang

    (Ningxia University)

  • Yung-ho Chiu

    (Soochow University)

  • Yuan-yuan Niu

    (Ningxia University)

  • Tzu-Han Chang

    (Soochow University)

Abstract

Improving industrial circular economy efficiency (ICEE) is an inevitable goal to realize industrial transformation and upgrading, and it is also an essential requirement for following a new path of industrialization. Few studies discuss quality of life (QoL) under industrial production, the circular economy, and environmental pollution and thus fail to recognize how QoL affects the development of the industrial circular economy. Most existing studies use the traditional DEA model for calculation, ignoring that the industrial circular economy system is complex and composed of a two-way closed loop including pollution control and resource recovery. Therefore, this research innovatively takes QoL as an exogenous variable, decomposes ICEE into two subsystems of industrial production efficiency and industrial circular efficiency, and constructs a new meta SBM dynamic circulation model that considers exogenous variables. We then re-evaluate ICEE and its stage efficiencies (industrial production efficiency and industrial circular efficiency) for 30 provinces in China after adding QoL. The study finds that ignoring QoL can lead to serious errors in ICEE. China’s overall ICEE is not high, and except for the nine provinces of Shanxi, Shandong, and Tianjin, which have reached the efficiency frontier, the ICEE of the remaining 21 provinces has room for improvement to varying degrees. From 2015 to 2020, the overall performance of ICEE, industrial production efficiency, and industrial cycle efficiency in terms of time series show an upward trend. The industrial production efficiency value is generally better than the industrial cycle efficiency value, contributing to overall efficiency, while industrial cycle efficiency drags down overall efficiency. The geographical distribution of ICEE exhibits clear stages. In 2015 and 2018–2020, the performance is east > central > west. From 2016 to 2017, the efficiency of the industrial circular economy is west > east > central, and the west region surpasses the east and central regions, achieving a qualitative leap. During the study period, industrial production efficiency presents a trend of east > west > central, and industrial circulation efficiency is distributed in a ladder shape of east > central > west. Regional differences in the efficiency of the industrial circular economy are obvious, but the gap between the three major regions is gradually narrowing.

Suggested Citation

  • Anqi Lei & Li Yang & Yung-ho Chiu & Yuan-yuan Niu & Tzu-Han Chang, 2025. "Reassessment of the efficiency of China's industrial circular economy considering quality of life: a meta recycle SBM dynamic under exogenous model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(8), pages 19435-19466, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04724-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-04724-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-04724-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-024-04724-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rehdanz, Katrin & Maddison, David, 2005. "Climate and happiness," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 111-125, January.
      • Katrin Rehdanz & David J. Maddison, 2003. "Climate and Happiness," Working Papers FNU-20, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Apr 2003.
    2. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2009. "Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 243-252, August.
    3. Yong Geng & Joseph Sarkis & Raimund Bleischwitz, 2019. "How to globalize the circular economy," Nature, Nature, vol. 565(7738), pages 153-155, January.
    4. Wen Zeng & Lili Xiang & Wenhe Zhang, 2020. "Evaluation of Life Quality and its Spatial Mismatch with Local Economic Development in Large Chinese Cities," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(1), pages 239-258, March.
    5. Christopher O’Donnell & D. Rao & George Battese, 2008. "Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 231-255, March.
    6. Millar, Neal & McLaughlin, Eoin & Börger, Tobias, 2019. "The Circular Economy: Swings and Roundabouts?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 11-19.
    7. Daniela Cordova-Pizarro & Ismael Aguilar-Barajas & David Romero & Ciro A. Rodriguez, 2019. "Circular Economy in the Electronic Products Sector: Material Flow Analysis and Economic Impact of Cellphone E-Waste in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Jesús Peiró-Palomino & Francesco Perugini & Andrés J Picazo-Tadeo, 2019. "Well-being and the Great Recession in Spain," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(15), pages 1279-1284, September.
    9. Kirchherr, Julian & Reike, Denise & Hekkert, Marko, 2017. "Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 221-232.
    10. Eduardo González & Ana Cárcaba & Juan Ventura, 2018. "Weight Constrained DEA Measurement of the Quality of Life in Spanish Municipalities in 2011," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 1157-1182, April.
    11. Chiara Garau & Valentina Maria Pavan, 2018. "Evaluating Urban Quality: Indicators and Assessment Tools for Smart Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Tobias Menz & Heinz Welsch, 2012. "Life-Cycle and Cohort Effects in the Valuation of Air Quality: Evidence from Subjective Well-being Data," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 88(2), pages 300-325.
    13. Ed Diener & Eunkook Suh, 1997. "Measuring Quality Of Life: Economic, Social, And Subjective Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 189-216, January.
    14. Roman Lacko & Zuzana Hajduová & Marcin Zawada, 2021. "The Efficiency of Circular Economies: A Comparison of Visegrád Group Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
    15. Worawej Onnom & Nitin Tripathi & Vilas Nitivattananon & Sarawut Ninsawat, 2018. "Development of a Liveable City Index (LCI) Using Multi Criteria Geospatial Modelling for Medium Class Cities in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Wu, Hua-qing & Shi, Yan & Xia, Qiong & Zhu, Wei-dong, 2014. "Effectiveness of the policy of circular economy in China: A DEA-based analysis for the period of 11th five-year-plan," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 163-175.
    17. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2010. "Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 145-156, June.
    18. Nicky Rogge & Ilse Nijverseel, 2019. "Quality of Life in the European Union: A Multidimensional Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 765-789, January.
    19. George Battese & D. Rao & Christopher O'Donnell, 2004. "A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating Under Different Technologies," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 91-103, January.
    20. George E. Battese & D. S. Prasada Rao, 2002. "Technology Gap, Efficiency, and a Stochastic Metafrontier Function," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 1(2), pages 87-93, August.
    21. Justin B. Hollander & Henry Renski & Cara Foster-Karim & Andrew Wiley, 2020. "Micro Quality of Life: Assessing Health and Well-Being in and around Public Facilities in New York City," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(3), pages 791-812, July.
    22. José Navarro-Azorín & Andrés Artal-Tur, 2015. "Foot Voting in Spain: What Do Internal Migrations Say About Quality of Life in the Spanish Municipalities?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 124(2), pages 501-515, November.
    23. Joanicjusz Nazarko & Ewa Chodakowska & Łukasz Nazarko, 2022. "Evaluating the Transition of the European Union Member States towards a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
    24. Wang, Yang & Zhang, Hong & Liu, Libing, 2022. "Does city construction improve life quality?-evidence from POI data of China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 643-653.
    25. Peng Li & Yaofu Ouyang, 2020. "Technical Change and Green Productivity," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(2), pages 271-298, July.
    26. Ana Paula Barreira & Carla Amado & Sérgio Santos & Jorge Andraz & Maria Helena Guimarães, 2021. "Assessment and Determinants of the Quality of Life in Portuguese Cities," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 44(6), pages 647-683, November.
    27. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    28. Eduardo González & Ana Cárcaba & Juan Ventura, 2011. "Quality Of Life Ranking Of Spanish Municipalities," Revista de Economia Aplicada, Universidad de Zaragoza, Departamento de Estructura Economica y Economia Publica, vol. 19(2), pages 123-148, Autumn.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongqi Feng & Haolin Zhang & Yung-ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang, 2021. "Innovation efficiency and the impact of the institutional quality: a cross-country analysis using the two-stage meta-frontier dynamic network DEA model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3091-3129, April.
    2. Yu, Ming-Miin & Lin, Chung-I & Chen, Kuan-Chen & Chen, Li-Hsueh, 2021. "Measuring Taiwanese bank performance: A two-system dynamic network data envelopment analysis approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Fang-Rong Ren & Ze Tian & Yu-Ting Shen & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tai-Yu Lin, 2019. "Energy, CO 2 , and AQI Efficiency and Improvement of the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Li Yang & Yung‐ho Chiu & Tzu‐Han Chang, 2023. "The impact of quality of life on industrial and agricultural production and environmental efficiency in China's provinces," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 1054-1072, March.
    5. Ying Li & Tai‐Yu Lin & Yung‐ho Chiu & Shu‐Ning Lin & Tzu‐Han Chang, 2021. "Impact of alliances and delay rate on airline performance," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(6), pages 1607-1618, September.
    6. Manuel de Maya Matallana & María López-Martínez & Prudencio José Riquelme-Perea, 2022. "Measurement of Quality of Life in Spanish Regions," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 1-30, February.
    7. Ze Tian & Fang-Rong Ren & Qin-Wen Xiao & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tai-Yu Lin, 2019. "Cross-Regional Comparative Study on Carbon Emission Efficiency of China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on the Meta-Frontier," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Hsiao-Yen Mao & Wen-Min Lu & Hsin-Yen Shieh, 2023. "Exploring the Influence of Environmental Investment on Multinational Enterprises’ Performance from the Sustainability and Marketability Efficiency Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Antonio Peyrache & Maria C. A. Silva, 2019. "The Inefficiency of Production Systems and its decomposition," CEPA Working Papers Series WP052019, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    10. Jiang, Guogang & Li, Yimin & Teng, Xiangyu & Cheng, An & Mao, YuanLong & Chang, Tzu-han & Chiu, Yung-ho, 2025. "Performance improvement of energy extraction and energy utilization to reduce carbon emissions in resource-rich Belt and Road Initiative countries: Applying a meta two-stage non-radial dynamic DEA mod," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    11. Kuei‐Ying Huang & Tzu‐Han Chang & Yung‐ho Chiu & Chih‐Yu Yang & Tai‐Yu Lin, 2023. "Considering climate change and regional differences: An efficiency assessment of coal mine use and land restoration," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 47(3), pages 578-601, August.
    12. Li, Lan-bing & Liu, Bing-lian & Liu, Wei-lin & Chiu, Yung-Ho, 2017. "Efficiency evaluation of the regional high-tech industry in China: A new framework based on meta-frontier dynamic DEA analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 24-33.
    13. Teng, Xiangyu & Zhuang, Weiwei & Liu, Fan-peng & Chang, Tzu-han & Chiu, Yung-ho, 2023. "China's path of carbon neutralization to develop green energy and improve energy efficiency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 397-408.
    14. Chen, Chun-Mei, 2019. "Evaluating the efficiency change and productivity progress of the top global telecom operators since OTT's prevalence," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1-1.
    15. Zhang, Tinglong & Li, Sasa & Li, Yifan & Wang, Weizhong, 2023. "Evaluation of technology innovation efficiency for the listed NEV enterprises in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1445-1458.
    16. Carlucci, Fabio & Corcione, Carlo & Mazzocchi, Paolo & Trincone, Barbara, 2021. "The role of logistics in promoting Italian agribusiness: The Belt and Road Initiative case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    17. Chiu, Yung-ho & Luo, Zhengying & Chen, Yu-Chuan & Wang, Zebin & Tsai, Min-Pei, 2013. "A comparison of operating performance management between Taiwan banks and foreign banks based on the Meta-Hybrid DEA model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 433-439.
    18. Qian Wang & Jinbao Yang & Yung‐ho Chiu & Tai‐Yu Lin, 2023. "Cross‐regional comparative study on digital finance and finance efficiency in China: The eastern and non‐eastern areas," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 68-83, January.
    19. Zhen Shi & Shijiong Qin & Yung-ho Chiu & Xiaoying Tan & Xiaoli Miao, 2021. "The impact of gross domestic product on the financing and investment efficiency of China’s commercial banks," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Kounetas, Konstantinos & Zervopoulos, Panagiotis D., 2019. "A cross-country evaluation of environmental performance: Is there a convergence-divergence pattern in technology gaps?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1136-1148.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04724-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.