IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i8d10.1007_s10668-024-04724-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reassessment of the efficiency of China's industrial circular economy considering quality of life: a meta recycle SBM dynamic under exogenous model

Author

Listed:
  • Anqi Lei

    (Ningxia University)

  • Li Yang

    (Ningxia University)

  • Yung-ho Chiu

    (Soochow University)

  • Yuan-yuan Niu

    (Ningxia University)

  • Tzu-Han Chang

    (Soochow University)

Abstract

Improving industrial circular economy efficiency (ICEE) is an inevitable goal to realize industrial transformation and upgrading, and it is also an essential requirement for following a new path of industrialization. Few studies discuss quality of life (QoL) under industrial production, the circular economy, and environmental pollution and thus fail to recognize how QoL affects the development of the industrial circular economy. Most existing studies use the traditional DEA model for calculation, ignoring that the industrial circular economy system is complex and composed of a two-way closed loop including pollution control and resource recovery. Therefore, this research innovatively takes QoL as an exogenous variable, decomposes ICEE into two subsystems of industrial production efficiency and industrial circular efficiency, and constructs a new meta SBM dynamic circulation model that considers exogenous variables. We then re-evaluate ICEE and its stage efficiencies (industrial production efficiency and industrial circular efficiency) for 30 provinces in China after adding QoL. The study finds that ignoring QoL can lead to serious errors in ICEE. China’s overall ICEE is not high, and except for the nine provinces of Shanxi, Shandong, and Tianjin, which have reached the efficiency frontier, the ICEE of the remaining 21 provinces has room for improvement to varying degrees. From 2015 to 2020, the overall performance of ICEE, industrial production efficiency, and industrial cycle efficiency in terms of time series show an upward trend. The industrial production efficiency value is generally better than the industrial cycle efficiency value, contributing to overall efficiency, while industrial cycle efficiency drags down overall efficiency. The geographical distribution of ICEE exhibits clear stages. In 2015 and 2018–2020, the performance is east > central > west. From 2016 to 2017, the efficiency of the industrial circular economy is west > east > central, and the west region surpasses the east and central regions, achieving a qualitative leap. During the study period, industrial production efficiency presents a trend of east > west > central, and industrial circulation efficiency is distributed in a ladder shape of east > central > west. Regional differences in the efficiency of the industrial circular economy are obvious, but the gap between the three major regions is gradually narrowing.

Suggested Citation

  • Anqi Lei & Li Yang & Yung-ho Chiu & Yuan-yuan Niu & Tzu-Han Chang, 2025. "Reassessment of the efficiency of China's industrial circular economy considering quality of life: a meta recycle SBM dynamic under exogenous model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(8), pages 19435-19466, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04724-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-04724-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-04724-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-024-04724-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04724-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.