Author
Listed:
- Ali Nasiri Khiavi
(Tarbiat Modares University)
- Mehdi Vafakhah
(Tarbiat Modares University)
- Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi
(Tarbiat Modares University)
Abstract
The conjunct application of various tools, such as collaborative watershed management and strategic planning models, is crucial for monitoring Flood Control and Management Measures (FCMMs). Therefore, this study was carried out with the aim of strategic flood management using collaborative Game Theory (GT) and conjunct application of hydrologic and strategic planning models in the Cheshmeh-Kileh Watershed, Iran. To address this, semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders to implement strategic planning models and FCMMs. Subsequently, FCMMs were strategically analyzed using SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) and PESTEL (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, and Legal) models. GT was utilized to prioritize these factors, leading to the determination of optimal FCMMs. Critical Sub-Watersheds (SW) were identified to assess the quantitative impacts of FCMMs, followed by quantifying the effects of the proposed measures using the HEC-HMS model. The results indicated that the combined matrix of strategic planning models revealed that the assessment of internal and external factors for nature-based measures, with weights of 3.966 and 1.609 respectively, and for structure-based measures, with weights of − 2.847 and − 3.486, confirmed that nature-based measures were identified as the most optimal choice. The prioritization results of the Sub-Watersheds (SW) indicated that the watershed upstream had a high Flood Generation Potential. The impact of nature-based and structure-based measures on Flood Control and Management (FCM) was observed to decrease. The integrated use of hydrological and strategic planning models demonstrated that nature-based measures in FCM exhibited greater effectiveness. Overall, it can be concluded that these approaches are directly applicable for use by executive managers, policymakers, and decision-makers in FCM.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04693-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.