Author
Listed:
- Lin Feng
(Northeastern University
Key Laboratory of Land Protection and Use, Department of Natural Resources of Liaoning Province)
- Ziyang Yu
(Northeastern University
Key Laboratory of Land Protection and Use, Department of Natural Resources of Liaoning Province)
- Guoping Lei
(Northeastern University
Key Laboratory of Land Protection and Use, Department of Natural Resources of Liaoning Province)
Abstract
Determining the ideal future land use pattern with the purpose of enhancing ecosystem services (ESs), weakening the trade-off, and strengthening the synergy between them is of major important for the sustainable use of black soil. Water retention (WR), water purification (WP), soil retention (SR), carbon storage (CS), habitat quality (HQ) were chosen to analyze the spatio-temporal change of ESs, as well as trade-offs and synergies amongst ESs from 2005 to 2020 in the the typical black soil region of northeastern China (TBSN). We used the cropland quality level as a limitation to identify the foremost sensible ecological redline area. By comparing the spatio-temporal change of ESs and their relationships from 2020 to 2035 below extraordinary scenarios representing natural development, cropland development, and ecological redline policies, we decided the ultimate land use pattern of TBSN. The results indicated that: (1) The conversion of cropland (+ 997.3 km2), grassland (-3527.82 km2), and built-up land (+ 2303.19 km2) was dramatic, and the landscape pattern become fragmented, notably in Songnen typical black soil subzone. (2) The ESs showed a noticeable downward trend, and the strength of trade-off increased in areas with large-scale conversions between land use types and increasing level of landscape fragmentation. (3) 10% was the optimal redline threshold for the main indicator. The ecological redline scenario was the optimal solution that maximized the improvement of ESs (WR + 51.93%, NE-6.30%, PE-5.50%, SR + 21.27%, CS + 6.68%, HQ + 0.73%), minimized trade-offs and maximized synergies in the coordinated development of cropland and ecological land. The findings can serve as a scientific foundation for ecosystems management and land resources allocation in black soil regions.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04688-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.