IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i7d10.1007_s10668-024-04617-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study of straw mulching and interplanting patterns on water use efficiency and productivity of the maize-soybean cropping system

Author

Listed:
  • Siping Liu

    (Shenyang Agricultural University)

  • Lixue Wang

    (Shenyang Agricultural University)

  • Ismail Khan

    (Jiangsu University)

  • Guanlin Li

    (Jiangsu University)

  • Abdul Rehman

    (The Islamia University of Bahawalpur)

  • Ran Suo

    (Chaoyang City Water Engineering Quality and Safety Supervision Station)

  • Liang Chang

    (Beijing Sola Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd)

  • Khulood Fahad Alabbosh

    (University of Hail)

  • Khalid Ali Khan

    (King Khalid University)

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the influence of intercropping and straw mulching on dynamics of soil water and thermal condition, with a specific emphasis on the content of inorganic nitrogen (N)—including NH4+–N and NO3–N—and, ultimately, their effects on crop yield and water-use efficiency. The experimental design employed in this study featured a split-plot arrangement of treatments, where the main plot comprised soybean (Glycine max L. Merill) monoculture (S), maize (Zea mays L.) monoculture (M), and soybean/maize intercrop (I), while subplot was comprised of various levels of straw mulch including no mulch application (M0), 4.8 t ha−1 (M1), 7.2 t ha−1 (M2), and 9.6 t ha−1 (M3). Results showed that straw mulching and planting patterns significantly affected the dry matter and grain yield of maize and soybean. Intercropping promotes maize dry matter and yield but inhibits soybeans. Soil moisture fluctuations in the 0–30 cm soil layer are influenced by rainfall dynamics, while the 40–60 cm soil layer remains relatively stable. Increasing straw mulch positively correlates with soil moisture, with intercropping displaying significantly higher moisture levels than monoculture. Soil temperature fluctuations decrease depth, with the 0–15 cm layer exhibiting greater variability. Straw mulching correlates with decreased soil temperature, and intercropping significantly lowers soil temperature than monoculture. Crop water productivity increases significantly with straw mulching and intercropping. The intercropping with 9.6 t ha−1 straw mulch (M3I) had the highest water productivity and water use efficiency (WUE) for maize, while soybean monoculture with 9.6 t ha−1 straw mulch M3S) had higher WUE for soybean. In conclusion; straw mulching and intercropping improve crop yield, soil moisture, water productivity, WUE and soil temperature regulation. These findings underscore the potential of these sustainable agricultural practices, offering valuable insights for guiding water-conserving and high-yield agricultural production.

Suggested Citation

  • Siping Liu & Lixue Wang & Ismail Khan & Guanlin Li & Abdul Rehman & Ran Suo & Liang Chang & Khulood Fahad Alabbosh & Khalid Ali Khan, 2025. "Comparative study of straw mulching and interplanting patterns on water use efficiency and productivity of the maize-soybean cropping system," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 16883-16911, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04617-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-04617-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-04617-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-024-04617-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04617-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.