IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i7d10.1007_s10668-024-04526-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic scenario modeling for priority assessment of sustainable development goals in China under interaction and uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Renlong Wang

    (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Shutian Cui

    (Northwest A&F University)

  • Mingang Gao

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

As an integrated and indivisible agenda encompassing the realms of economics, society, and the environment, the sustainable development goals (SDGs) manifest intricate interactions and uncertainties. These complexities pose numerous challenges for nations in their pursuit of the SDGs, including the need to harmonize SDGs (co-benefits or trade-offs), prioritize SDGs, and shape forward-thinking and coordinated development pathways. Consequently, this study introduces a systematic scenario modeling approach, founded upon the CIA-ISM framework, to assess SDG priority and analyze development pathways. The approach is a scalable and generic modeling approach that can effectively addresses the interactions between the SDGs while accounting for uncertainty. Modeling with the focus on the 17 SDGs, the implementation of the CIA-ISM framework initially engages the experts to estimate the occurrence likelihood and interaction degree of SDGs, thereby facilitating priority assessment, causal scenario generation, and sensitivity analysis. This study utilizes China as a demonstrative application for the proposed framework and validates the outcomes through expert feedback and pertinent literature. Based on the outcomes, three SDG implementation pathways of China are recommended with the most robust and foundational causal loops G1 and G5 as the starting point: G1 + G5 → G8 → G3 → G7; G1 + G5 → G2 → G13 → G15, and G1 + G5 → G2 → G6 + G12. Overall, the CIA-ISM-based scenario modeling approach proves adept at capturing the prioritized and hierarchically clear causal pathways of the SDGs, arising from their intricate interaction, while factoring in uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Renlong Wang & Shutian Cui & Mingang Gao, 2025. "Systematic scenario modeling for priority assessment of sustainable development goals in China under interaction and uncertainty," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 15851-15886, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04526-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-04526-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-04526-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-024-04526-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04526-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.