Author
Abstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the construction sector has opened new avenues for advancing Industrial Symbiosis (IS) research. However, existing literature lacks a comprehensive comparison of how leading AI digital assistants contribute to this field. This study addresses this gap by examining the performance of four prominent AI models, Gemini, CoPilot, ChatGPT-Classic, and ChatGPT-Advanced in generating responses related to IS opportunities in construction industry. The methodology involves a two-stage analysis: first, questions related to IS concepts and practices are posed to each AI model to test their response reproducibility, measured using BLEU, METEOR, and Cosine Similarity scores. This is followed by human expert evaluations to validate the quality of the responses. In the second stage, the models are tasked with defining the European Waste Catalogue (EWC) codes and Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community (NACE) sector classifications associated with the selected waste materials, followed by identifying potential IS opportunities. Key findings reveal significant variability in the models’ capabilities. ChatGPT models consistently demonstrate higher semantic alignment with expert evaluations in both the general questions and IS opportunity identification. In contrast, CoPilot shows strengths in syntactic accuracy but sometimes lacks depth in contextual understanding. The study also identifies that while some AI models are adept at defining waste codes and sector classifications, their ability to identify practical IS opportunities varies. These insights underscore the need for an integrated approach, combining AI-generated data with human expertise, to fully exploit IS potential in construction. This study not only sheds light on the current state of AI in IS identification but also provides a framework for evaluating AI models in similar contexts. Future studies should focus on enhancing AI models’ contextual understanding and broadening their applications to promote sustainable industrial practices across various sectors.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-024-05794-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.