Author
Listed:
- Lokesh Choudhary
(The NorthCap University)
- Vaishali Sahu
(The NorthCap University)
- Archanaa Dongre
(Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute)
Abstract
With rising carbon loads on the environment and the need to support infrastructure development in developing countries, using traditional building materials without disrupting the ecosystem has become a challenge. Several initiatives have been implemented and are continuously being considered to alleviate the current situation. Hence, the current study attempts to reinforce the utility of geopolymer mixes by investigating mechanical properties of ternary geopolymer mortar along with microstructural examination. Blend A, which contains Fly Ash (FA), Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS), and Metakaolin (MK), and Blend B, which contains FA, GGBS, and Rice Husk Ash (RHA) in varying proportions, have been made with Natural River Sand (NS). Another set of comparable mixes containing Foundry Sand (FS) was also tested to build a performance comparison and propose a possible replacement option for natural river sand in construction. Experimental observations revealed superiority of blend A in mechanical strength over blend B. Also, foundry sand proved to produce mixes with lesser strength in comparison to natural sand mixes. However, all samples with FS were seen to fulfill the minimum strength criteria laid down by IS 2250: 1981. Microstructural tests such as Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis (EDX) were also carried out to establish reasoning in the strength variation shown by various blends. The concentration of heavy metals leached out in conformity with APHA 3120 was also tested to analyze the environmental impact of such innovative blends, and no combination was found to leach out heavy metals over the acceptable threshold. The outcomes of the study, thus support the usage of ternary geopolymer mixes over unary and binary mixes for high-quality precast member production.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04727-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.