IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i10d10.1007_s10668-023-04416-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing energy, economic, environmental and social impacts of fostering energy efficiency technologies: a Portuguese case study

Author

Listed:
  • Marcos Tenente

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering)

  • Carla Henriques

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
    ISCAC
    CeBER, Faculty of Economics)

  • Álvaro Gomes

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering)

  • Patrícia Pereira Silva

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
    CeBER, Faculty of Economics)

Abstract

This work suggests an overarching methodology that couples Hybrid Input–Output Lifecycle Analysis with thermal dynamic simulation. This methodological framework allows for a comprehensive evaluation of the energy, economic, environmental, and social impacts of fostering energy efficiency solutions in the residential sector. The main goal is to provide practical guidance to decision-makers in the formulation of appropriate funding strategies. The energy efficiency solutions under scrutiny consist of replacing compact fluorescent lamps with light emitting diode lamps, applying expanded polystyrene and insulation cork board on roofs and facades and installing heat pumps, biomass boilers, and gas boilers for space heating. The findings suggest that switching to more efficient lighting devices brings environmental, energy, and health benefits, but it may also have adverse effects on the economy and employment. Regarding insulation, applying expanded polystyrene simultaneously to roofs and facades results in a 63% decrease in energy requirements. However, the manufacturing, packaging, installation, and maintenance phases result in 3,500 tons of greenhouse gas emissions and the consumption of 57TJ of primary energy, while 380 jobs and 11 M€ in gross value added are generated. Finally, heat pumps appear to be the most environmentally friendly equipment, while gas boilers have the highest lifecycle energy consumption, and biomass boilers have the highest economic and employment benefits, despite leading to the greatest potential of premature deaths.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcos Tenente & Carla Henriques & Álvaro Gomes & Patrícia Pereira Silva, 2025. "Assessing energy, economic, environmental and social impacts of fostering energy efficiency technologies: a Portuguese case study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(10), pages 24247-24270, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04416-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04416-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-04416-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-04416-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04416-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.