IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v25y2023i11d10.1007_s10668-022-02622-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study on the mechanical and acid resistance characteristics of ambient temperature-cured glass waste and fly ash-based geopolymeric masonry mortars

Author

Listed:
  • Sourav Kumar Das

    (Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur
    Manipal University Jaipur)

  • Sandeep Shrivastava

    (Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur)

Abstract

This article reports a comparative analysis between glass waste and fly ash (which is the most studied waste for the alkali-activated products) to measure their effectiveness as a sole precursor to produce geopolymers. Globally, around 11.4 million tonnes of glass waste is generated per annum, and this needs to be managed properly. To address this issue, in this study, glass waste which was mostly manufactured bottles and containers was used in pulverized form. The molarity of the sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution was kept as 6 M, 8 M, and 10 M. The sodium silicate-to-sodium hydroxide (Na2SiO3/NaOH) solution mix ratio was varied between 1.5 and 3.5. Mechanical (compressive and flexural strength) and durability (resistance to different levels of sulfuric acid) aspects were studied along with micro-analysis (structural, elemental, and thermal). Controlled ambient temperature curing was followed for all the samples. Our findings showed that mechanical properties were dependent on the molarity, silicate modulus, and alkaline mixture (AM) ratio. The glass waste showed substantial amount of long-term strength development over fly ash with a maximum compressive strength gain at 28 d and 90 d curing age of 90% and 194% for 8M1.5AM and 6M1.5AM mixture, respectively. For flexural strength, it was 49% and 62% gain at 28-d and 90-d curing, respectively, for 10M1.5AM mixture. The glass waste also offered relatively higher resistance to acid attack with a maximum compressive strength loss of 61% and 55.7%, whereas fly ash-based mixtures recorded 75% and 71.73% reduction for 5% and 3% H2SO4 attack for 28 d, respectively. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) revealed that the glass waste specimens were more compact than fly ash-based specimens. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) results indicate that glass waste-based geopolymers are more thermally resistant than fly ash-based geopolymers when exposed to a systematic increment in temperature. Ultimately, promising results in terms of mechanical and durability aspects propose the use of glass waste as a binder in geopolymeric masonry mortar applications. Glass waste has a full potential to be a sole precursor to produce geopolymer under ambient temperature curing conditions. This will contribute towards sustainable environment by paving path for an effective utilization of the glass waste.

Suggested Citation

  • Sourav Kumar Das & Sandeep Shrivastava, 2023. "A comparative study on the mechanical and acid resistance characteristics of ambient temperature-cured glass waste and fly ash-based geopolymeric masonry mortars," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 13399-13427, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:11:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02622-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02622-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02622-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02622-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:11:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02622-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.