IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v24y2022i12d10.1007_s10668-021-02020-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community structure and species diversity of forest vegetation in a protected area of Western Himalayan region of India

Author

Listed:
  • Dipika Rana

    (Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences
    Himalayan Forest Research Institute)

  • Kulraj Singh Kapoor

    (Himalayan Forest Research Institute)

  • Anupam Bhatt

    (CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource and Technology)

  • Sher Singh Samant

    (Himalayan Forest Research Institute)

Abstract

The monitoring of species diversity is a key pre-requisite for understanding and managing forest ecosystems. The vegetation assessment of the forests at the habitat and community levels in the forest ecosystems can help in its proper monitoring and formulation of conservation strategies. With this aspect, the present study was conducted in the Shimla water catchment Sanctuary (SWCS) of Western Himalayan region from 2011 to 2014. A total of 476 species of vascular plants were recorded with angiosperms (101 families, 307 genera, and 431 species), gymnosperms (3 families, 7 genera, and 9 species), and pteridophytes (11 families, 17 genera, and 36 species). Among these 39 species were the trees, 81 shrubs, 320 herbs, and the remaining 36 species were pteridophytes. The quantitative analysis showed the presence of 312 species at varying altitudes, aspects, slopes in the different identified communities. Further, tree communities were delineated based on IVI while shrub communities on the basis of relative density. A total of twenty-one forest communities (trees 15 and shrubs 6) were identified in the altitudinal range between 1850 to 2750 m above msl. In general, Shannon diversity index (H’) for trees ranged from 1.40 to 2.10, seedlings (0.67–1.51); saplings (0.62–1.72); shrubs 2.02–3.16 and herbs 2.47–4.38 while the values of concentration of dominance for trees ranged from 0.17 to 0.45, whereas in seedlings these values varied from 0.28 to 0.77. Saplings showed a range of 0.18–0.57, shrubs from 0.03 to 0.17, and herbs 0.03–0.16 for the values of Cd. The similarity values were evaluated by the Jaccard index among different communities in the tree, seedling, sapling, shrub, and herb layers which showed the presence and absence of various species. More than 50 per cent similarity was found in the shrub layer (77 community pairs) followed by seedling layer (61 community pairs), sapling layer (47 community pairs), and tree layer (44 community pairs). Least similarity (less than 50 per cent) was found for herb layer (7 community pairs) with maximum dissimilarity. The high level of dissimilarity can be attributed to the high level of disturbance in the forest layer. The application of vegetation indices can be a useful tool in predicting the structure of the forest vegetation and also vital in developing adequate management strategies for conservation of plant diversity. In the SWCS, the plant communities with high species diversity and more heterogeneity require specific conservation strategies as these can be considered as rich zones or pockets of floral diversity in this ecosystem. Invasions by non-native species can be a threat to the forest flora that needs proper management.

Suggested Citation

  • Dipika Rana & Kulraj Singh Kapoor & Anupam Bhatt & Sher Singh Samant, 2022. "Community structure and species diversity of forest vegetation in a protected area of Western Himalayan region of India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 14011-14032, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-021-02020-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-02020-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-02020-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-02020-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-021-02020-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.