IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/empeco/v29y2004i2p451-462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Retesting symmetry and homogeneity in a cointegrated demand system with bootstrapping: The case of meat demand in Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Kelvin. G. Balcombe

    ()

Abstract

A small Almost Ideal Demand System is estimated for Greek meat consumption using the Johansen procedure in conjunction with parametric bootstrapping and Bartlett corrections. Asymptotic Wald and likelihood ratio tests broadly support the predicted number of cointegrating relationships but reject symmetry and homogeneity. Bootstrapping and Bartlett corrections give support to symmetry and homogeneity but give less support for the predicted number of cointegrating relationships. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2004

Suggested Citation

  • Kelvin. G. Balcombe, 2004. "Retesting symmetry and homogeneity in a cointegrated demand system with bootstrapping: The case of meat demand in Greece," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 451-462, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:empeco:v:29:y:2004:i:2:p:451-462
    DOI: 10.1007/s00181-003-0177-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00181-003-0177-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Balcombe, Kelvin & Bailey, Alastair, 2006. "Bayesian inference of a smooth transition dynamic almost ideal model of food demand in the US," MPRA Paper 17305, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Blazej Mazur, 2006. "Imposing Economic Restrictions in a VECM-form Demand System," Dynamic Econometric Models, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 7, pages 269-280.
    3. repec:wsi:wsbook:6875 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Paul Oslington, 2012. "General Equilibrium: Theory and Evidence," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 88(282), pages 446-448, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:empeco:v:29:y:2004:i:2:p:451-462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.