IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eaiere/v17y2020i2d10.1007_s40844-020-00163-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost estimation for alternative aviation plans against potential radiation exposure associated with solar proton events for the airline industry

Author

Listed:
  • Yosuke A. Yamashiki

    (Kyoto University)

  • Moe Fujita

    (Kyoto University)

  • Tatsuhiko Sato

    (Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA))

  • Hiroyuki Maehara

    (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, NINS)

  • Yuta Notsu

    (University of Colorado Boulder)

  • Kazunari Shibata

    (Kyoto University)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a systematic approach to effectively evaluate potential risk cost caused by exposure to solar proton events (SPEs) from solar flares for the airline industry. We also evaluate associated health risks from radiation using ExoKyoto, to provide relevant alternative ways to minimize economic loss and opportunity. The estimated radiation dose induced by each solar proton events (SPE) for the passengers of each flight is calculated using ExoKyoto and PHITS. We determine a few scenarios for the estimated dose limit at 1 mSv, and 20 mSv, corresponding to the effective dose limit for the general public and occupational exposure, respectively, as well as a higher dose induced an extreme superflare. We set a hypothetical airline shutdown scenario at 1 mSv for a single flight per passenger, due to legal restrictions under the potential radiation dose. In such a scenario, we calculate the potential loss in direct and opportunity cost under the cancelation of the flight. At the same time, we considered that, even under such a scenario, if the airplane flies at a slightly lower altitude (from 12 to 9.5 km, corresponding to the slight increase of atmospheric depth from 234 to 365 g/cm2), the total loss becomes much smaller than flight cancelation, and the estimated total dose now goes down from 1.2 to 0.45 mSv, which is below the effective dose limit for the general public. In the case of flying at an even lower altitude (7 km corresponding atmospheric depth with 484 g/cm2), the estimated total dose becomes much smaller, to 0.12 m Sv. If we assume the increase of fuel cost is proportional to the increase in atmospheric depth, the increase in cost becomes 1.56 and 2.07 for the case of flying at 9.5 km and at 7 km, respectively. Lower altitude flights provide more safety for the potential risk of radiation doses induced by severe SPEs. At the same time, since there is total loss caused by flight cancelation, we propose that considering lower flight altitude is the best protection against solar flares.

Suggested Citation

  • Yosuke A. Yamashiki & Moe Fujita & Tatsuhiko Sato & Hiroyuki Maehara & Yuta Notsu & Kazunari Shibata, 2020. "Cost estimation for alternative aviation plans against potential radiation exposure associated with solar proton events for the airline industry," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 487-499, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eaiere:v:17:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s40844-020-00163-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s40844-020-00163-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40844-020-00163-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40844-020-00163-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuichi Ikeda, 2020. "Special issue: the 7th international symposium on human survivability “let’s work together toward achieving the sustainable development goals”—part II," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 469-471, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eaiere:v:17:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s40844-020-00163-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.