Author
Abstract
Introduction Pimavanserin is the only antipsychotic medication approved in the USA to specifically treat hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson’s disease psychosis (PDP). Objective To compare mortality risk in patients with PDP after initiation of pimavanserin or comparator atypical antipsychotics in an overall PDP cohort and in a subcohort of patients residing in long-term care or skilled nursing facilities (LTC/SNFs). Methods This cohort study identified patients aged ≥ 65 years with PDP initiating pimavanserin or a comparator antipsychotic in US Medicare claims (2016–2021). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) comparing all-cause mortality in the propensity score-matched treatment groups. Cumulative incidence curves, time period-specific relative risk, and risk difference estimates evaluated risk over time. Results In this follow-up analysis, we identified 4384 pimavanserin initiators and 28,042 comparator initiators in the overall PDP cohort, and 921 pimavanserin initiators and 7963 comparator initiators in the LTC/SNF subcohort. After matching, the overall PDP cohort had 4381 patients in each treatment group, and the LTC/SNF subcohort had 905 patients in each group. The matched HR for mortality (pimavanserin versus comparator) was 0.76 (95% CI 0.68–0.85) in the overall PDP cohort and 0.90 (95% CI 0.74–1.10) in the LTC/SNF subcohort. In the overall PDP cohort, time period-specific relative risks and risk differences showed that pimavanserin initiators had a lower risk of mortality throughout the first 365 days of follow-up. Conclusion In the overall PDP cohort, mortality risk was lower among pimavanserin initiators than comparator antipsychotic initiators.
Suggested Citation
Sapna Rao & Lisa J. McQuay & Joan Forns & Rebecca MacKay & Heather E. Danysh & Dilesh Doshi & Victor Abler & Mary S. Anthony & J. Bradley Layton, 2025.
"Evaluation of Mortality in Users of Pimavanserin Compared with Other Atypical Antipsychotics in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease Psychosis: An Update,"
Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 48(8), pages 893-907, August.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:48:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s40264-025-01543-8
DOI: 10.1007/s40264-025-01543-8
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:48:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s40264-025-01543-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.