Author
Listed:
- Meredith Y. Smith
(Evidera, Inc.
University of Southern California)
- Rachel Davis
(Evidera, Inc.)
- Priya Bahri
(European Medicines Agency)
- Delphine Saragoussi
(Sanofi)
- Viviana Nguyen
(Evidera, Inc.)
- Gita A. Toyserkani
(US Food and Drug Administration)
- Alison Hamilton
(Veterans Administration (VA) Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater los Angeles Healthcare System
University of California los Angeles)
Abstract
Background Significant methodological shortcomings have been documented to date in risk minimisation program evaluations for medicinal products, including overreliance on survey methods alone. Recently updated guidances from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommend the use of frameworks and mixed methods designs to improve the rigor of these assessments. Objective The purpose of this paper was to exemplify how a mixed methods approach, guided by an implementation science framework, can be used to design the evaluation of a risk minimisation program. Methods We selected the Practical, Robust, Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) as the implementation science framework to guide our mixed methods approach. PRISM provides a comprehensive and systematic approach to measuring the key domains relevant to the implementation and outcomes of a risk minimisation program. We mapped the PRISM domains to the evaluation dimensions described in the EMA and FDA guidances. We then specified a mixed methods evaluation design and data collection methods using a fictitious risk minimisation program as a case study for illustrative purposes. Results On the basis of our case study, we developed quantitative and qualitative measures, including specific items for surveys and interviews, for both formative and summative evaluations. For both the formative and summative evaluations, measures focussed on assessing (1) contextual factors that could affect program implementation and impact and (2) outcomes including implementability and acceptability as well as degree of program reach, adoption, implementation, effectiveness and maintenance. Conclusions Mixed methods, guided by a well-established implementation science framework, can be applied to ensure comprehensive formative and summative evaluations that provide fit-for-purpose information that may inform regulatory decision-making.
Suggested Citation
Meredith Y. Smith & Rachel Davis & Priya Bahri & Delphine Saragoussi & Viviana Nguyen & Gita A. Toyserkani & Alison Hamilton, 2025.
"Using Mixed Methods to Evaluate Risk Minimisation Programs in Europe and the USA: An Innovative Blueprint,"
Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 48(7), pages 821-838, July.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:48:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s40264-025-01533-w
DOI: 10.1007/s40264-025-01533-w
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:48:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s40264-025-01533-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.