IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v47y2024i9d10.1007_s40264-024-01430-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Timing Matters: A Machine Learning Method for the Prioritization of Drug–Drug Interactions Through Signal Detection in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Their Relationship with Time of Co-exposure

Author

Listed:
  • Vera Battini

    (University of Copenhagen
    Sacco University Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano)

  • Marianna Cocco

    (University of Copenhagen)

  • Maria Antonietta Barbieri

    (University of Copenhagen
    University of Messina)

  • Greg Powell

    (GSK)

  • Carla Carnovale

    (Sacco University Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano)

  • Emilio Clementi

    (Sacco University Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano
    IRCCS E. Medea)

  • Andrew Bate

    (GSK
    University of London)

  • Maurizio Sessa

    (University of Copenhagen)

Abstract

Introduction Current drug–drug interaction (DDI) detection methods often miss the aspect of temporal plausibility, leading to false-positive disproportionality signals in spontaneous reporting system (SRS) databases. Objective This study aims to develop a method for detecting and prioritizing temporally plausible disproportionality signals of DDIs in SRS databases by incorporating co-exposure time in disproportionality analysis. Methods The method was tested in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The CRESCENDDI dataset of positive controls served as the primary source of true-positive DDIs. Disproportionality analysis was performed considering the time of co-exposure. Temporal plausibility was assessed using the flex point of cumulative reporting of disproportionality signals. Potential confounders were identified using a machine learning method (i.e. Lasso regression). Results Disproportionality analysis was conducted on 122 triplets with more than three cases, resulting in the prioritization of 61 disproportionality signals (50.0%) involving 13 adverse events, with 61.5% of these included in the European Medicine Agency’s (EMA’s) Important Medical Event (IME) list. A total of 27 signals (44.3%) had at least ten cases reporting the triplet of interest, and most of them (n = 19; 70.4%) were temporally plausible. The retrieved confounders were mainly other concomitant drugs. Conclusions Our method was able to prioritize disproportionality signals with temporal plausibility. This finding suggests a potential for our method in pinpointing signals that are more likely to be furtherly validated.

Suggested Citation

  • Vera Battini & Marianna Cocco & Maria Antonietta Barbieri & Greg Powell & Carla Carnovale & Emilio Clementi & Andrew Bate & Maurizio Sessa, 2024. "Timing Matters: A Machine Learning Method for the Prioritization of Drug–Drug Interactions Through Signal Detection in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Their Relationship with Time of Co-exp," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 47(9), pages 895-907, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:9:d:10.1007_s40264-024-01430-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-024-01430-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-024-01430-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-024-01430-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:9:d:10.1007_s40264-024-01430-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.