IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v47y2024i6d10.1007_s40264-024-01408-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Factors Associated with Medication Administration Errors in Children: A Prospective Direct Observational Study of Paediatric Inpatients

Author

Listed:
  • Johanna I. Westbrook

    (Macquarie University)

  • Ling Li

    (Macquarie University)

  • Amanda Woods

    (Macquarie University)

  • Tim Badgery-Parker

    (Macquarie University)

  • Virginia Mumford

    (Macquarie University)

  • Alison Merchant

    (Macquarie University)

  • Erin Fitzpatrick

    (Macquarie University)

  • Magdalena Z. Raban

    (Macquarie University)

Abstract

Introduction Limited evidence exists regarding medication administration errors (MAEs) on general paediatric wards or associated risk factors exists. Objective The aim of this study was to identify nurse, medication, and work-environment factors associated with MAEs among paediatric inpatients. Methods This was a prospective, direct observational study of 298 nurses in a paediatric referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. Trained observers recorded details of 5137 doses prepared and administered to 1530 children between 07:00 h and 22:00 h on weekdays and weekends. Observation data were compared with medication charts to identify errors. Clinical errors, potential severity and actual harm were assessed. Nurse characteristics (e.g. age, sex, experience), medication type (route, high-risk medications, use of solvent/diluent), and work variables (e.g. time of administration, weekday/weekend, use of an electronic medication management system [eMM], presence of a parent/carer) were collected. Multivariable models assessed MAE risk factors for any error, errors by route, potentially serious errors, and errors involving high-risk medication or causing actual harm. Results Errors occurred in 37.0% (n = 1899; 95% confidence interval [CI] 35.7–38.3) of administrations, 25.8% (n = 489; 95% CI 23.8–27.9) of which were rated as potentially serious. Intravenous infusions and injections had high error rates (64.7% [n = 514], 95% CI 61.3–68.0; and 77.4% [n = 188], 95% CI 71.7–82.2, respectively). For intravenous injections, 59.7% (95% CI 53.4–65.6) had potentially serious errors. No nurse characteristics were associated with MAEs. Intravenous route, early morning and weekend administrations, patient age ≥ 11 years, oral medications requiring solvents/diluents and eMM use were all significant risk factors. MAEs causing actual harm were 45% lower using an eMM compared with paper charts. Conclusion Medication error prevention strategies should target intravenous administrations and not neglect older children in hospital. Attention to nurses’ work environments, including improved design and integration of medication technologies, is warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Johanna I. Westbrook & Ling Li & Amanda Woods & Tim Badgery-Parker & Virginia Mumford & Alison Merchant & Erin Fitzpatrick & Magdalena Z. Raban, 2024. "Risk Factors Associated with Medication Administration Errors in Children: A Prospective Direct Observational Study of Paediatric Inpatients," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 545-556, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s40264-024-01408-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-024-01408-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-024-01408-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-024-01408-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam Sutherland & Matthew D. Jones & Moninne Howlett & Sara Arenas-Lopez & Arif Patel & Bryony Dean Franklin, 2022. "Developing Strategic Recommendations for Implementing Smart Pumps in Advanced Healthcare Systems to Improve Intravenous Medication Safety," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 45(8), pages 881-889, August.
    2. Peter J. Gates & Melissa T. Baysari & Virginia Mumford & Magdalena Z. Raban & Johanna I. Westbrook, 2019. "Standardising the Classification of Harm Associated with Medication Errors: The Harm Associated with Medication Error Classification (HAMEC)," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(8), pages 931-939, August.
    3. Ann Blandford & Patricia C. Dykes & Bryony Dean Franklin & Dominic Furniss & Galal H. Galal-Edeen & Kumiko O. Schnock & David W. Bates, 2019. "Intravenous Infusion Administration: A Comparative Study of Practices and Errors Between the United States and England and Their Implications for Patient Safety," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(10), pages 1157-1165, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Herrero & Blanca Sánchez-Santiago & Marina Cano & Ramon Sancibrian & Raj Ratwani & Galo Peralta, 2023. "Prioritizing Patient Safety: Analysis of the Procurement Process of Infusion Pumps in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(24), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Tiina Syyrilä & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen & Marja Härkänen, 2020. "Communication issues contributing to medication incidents: Mixed‐method analysis of hospitals’ incident reports using indicator phrases based on literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2466-2481, July.
    3. Wan‐Ting K. Su & Mark R. Lehto & Dan D. Degnan & Yuehwern Yih & Vincent G. Duffy & Poching DeLaurentis, 2020. "Healthcare Professionals Risk Assessments for Alert Overrides in High‐Risk IV Infusions Using Simulated Scenarios," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(7), pages 1342-1354, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s40264-024-01408-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.