IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v47y2024i4d10.1007_s40264-023-01390-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drug-Induced Liver Injury in the Elderly: Consensus Statements and Recommendations from the IQ-DILI Initiative

Author

Listed:
  • Eric B. Cohen

    (AbbVie Inc.)

  • Meenal Patwardhan

    (AbbVie Inc.)

  • Ritu Raheja

    (AbbVie Inc.)

  • David H. Alpers

    (Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Raul J. Andrade

    (IBIMA_Plataforma Bionand, University of Malaga)

  • Mark I. Avigan

    (Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research)

  • James H. Lewis

    (Georgetown University)

  • Don C. Rockey

    (Medical University of South Carolina)

  • Francis Chui

    (Gilead Sciences Inc.)

  • Alexandru M. Iacob

    (AbbVie Inc.)

  • Camila C. Linardi

    (Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals LLC)

  • Arie Regev

    (Eli Lilly and Company)

  • Jesse Shick

    (Gilead Sciences Inc.)

  • M Isabel Lucena

    (IBIMA_Plataforma Bionand, University of Malaga)

Abstract

The elderly demographic is the fastest-growing segment of the world’s population and is projected to exceed 1.5 billion people by 2050. With multimorbidity, polypharmacy, susceptibility to drug–drug interactions, and frailty as distinct risk factors, elderly patients are especially vulnerable to developing potentially life-threatening safety events such as serious forms of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). It has been a longstanding shortcoming that elderly individuals are often a vulnerable population underrepresented in clinical trials. As such, an improved understanding of DILI in the elderly is a high-priority, unmet need. This challenge is underscored by recent documents put forward by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) that encourage data collection in the elderly and recommend improved practices that will facilitate a more inclusive approach. To establish what is already known about DILI in the elderly and pinpoint key gaps of knowledge in this arena, a working definition of “elderly” is required that accounts for both chronologic and biologic ages and varying states of frailty. In addition, it is critical to characterize the biological role of aging on liver function, as well as the different epidemiological factors such as polypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing that are common practices. While data may not show that elderly people are more susceptible to DILI, DILI due to specific drugs might be more common in this population. Improved characterization of DILI in the elderly may enhance diagnostic and prognostic capabilities and improve the way in which liver safety is monitored during clinical trials. This summary of the published literature provides a framework to understand and evaluate the risk of DILI in the elderly. Consensus statements and recommendations can help to optimize medical care and catalyze collaborations between academic clinicians, drug manufacturers, and regulatory scientists to enable the generation of high-quality research data relevant to the elderly population.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric B. Cohen & Meenal Patwardhan & Ritu Raheja & David H. Alpers & Raul J. Andrade & Mark I. Avigan & James H. Lewis & Don C. Rockey & Francis Chui & Alexandru M. Iacob & Camila C. Linardi & Arie Reg, 2024. "Drug-Induced Liver Injury in the Elderly: Consensus Statements and Recommendations from the IQ-DILI Initiative," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 301-319, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01390-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01390-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-023-01390-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-023-01390-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01390-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.