IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v47y2024i4d10.1007_s40264-023-01386-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Critical Intersect of Regulations, Health Technology Assessment, and Drug Safety Assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Wen-Wen Yang

    (Fu Jen Catholic University
    Health Outcomes and Technology Teaching and Education Alliance)

  • Yi-Chen Juan

    (National Taiwan University Hospital)

  • Grace Hui-Min Wu

    (Health Outcomes and Technology Teaching and Education Alliance
    National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University)

  • Raoh-Fang Pwu

    (Fu Jen Catholic University
    Health Outcomes and Technology Teaching and Education Alliance
    Taipei Medical University)

Abstract

Health technology assessment (HTA) is a multidisciplinary process that determines the value of health technology at different points in its lifecycle. Safety issues have become more important since regulatory authorities are increasingly adopting flexible standards, processes, and evidentiary requirements for drug approval. In this article, we compared the different role of regulatory authorities and HTA agencies. Additionally, the experience of regulatory-HTA collaboration for assessment and/or decision-making on safety issues in the lifecycle of a health technology is illustrated, including olmesartan (angiotensin II receptor antagonist) and the direct-acting hepatitis C virus (HCV) antiviral agents. Post-licensing data can be derived from various sources such as electronic health records, medical claims, drug and disease registries, post-authorization safety studies (PASS) or post-authorization safety efficacy studies (PAES), periodic benefit–risk assessment reports, as well as HTA reassessment reports, which incorporate utilization information from patients in a real-world setting and provide crucial evidence for various purposes. With the ongoing accumulation of safety and efficacy information during post-regulatory approval, a standardized process for continuous data collection and active reassessment of risk and benefit becomes crucial for managing the lifecycle of health technologies. In order to define evidence requirements clearly, reduce uncertainty, and minimize delays in HTA approval, early engagement and collaboration of HTA agencies in the regulatory review processes have become more common. However, there is currently limited interaction and collaboration between regulatory authorities and HTA agencies. This article aims to identify the challenges faced by regulators and HTA agencies today, emphasizing the significance of conducting regulatory reviews and health technology assessments throughout a technology's lifecycle, underlining the value of utilizing real-world data and evidence, and emphasizing the necessity of enhancing collaboration between regulatory authorities and HTA agencies, all within the overarching context of drug safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen-Wen Yang & Yi-Chen Juan & Grace Hui-Min Wu & Raoh-Fang Pwu, 2024. "The Critical Intersect of Regulations, Health Technology Assessment, and Drug Safety Assessments," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 289-299, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01386-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01386-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-023-01386-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-023-01386-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01386-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.