IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v47y2024i3d10.1007_s40264-023-01391-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Transparency in Defining Studied Drugs: The Open-Source Living DiAna Dictionary for Standardizing Drug Names in the FAERS

Author

Listed:
  • Michele Fusaroli

    (University of Bologna)

  • Valentina Giunchi

    (University of Bologna)

  • Vera Battini

    (ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Università degli Studi di Milano)

  • Stefano Puligheddu

    (University of Bologna)

  • Charles Khouri

    (Grenoble Alpes University Hospital
    University of Grenoble Alpes)

  • Carla Carnovale

    (ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Università degli Studi di Milano)

  • Emanuel Raschi

    (University of Bologna)

  • Elisabetta Poluzzi

    (University of Bologna)

Abstract

Introduction In refining drug safety signals, defining the object of study is crucial. While research has explored the effect of different event definitions, drug definition is often overlooked. The US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) records drug names as free text, necessitating mapping to active ingredients. Although pre-mapped databases exist, the subjectivity and lack of transparency of the mapping process lead to a loss of control over the object of study. Objective We implemented the DiAna dictionary, systematically mapping individual free-text instances to their corresponding active ingredients and linking them to the World Health Organization Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (WHO-ATC) classification. Methods We retrieved all drug names reported to the FAERS (2004–December 2022). Using existing vocabularies and string editing, we automatically mapped free text to ingredients. We manually revised the mapping and linked it to the ATC classification. Results We retrieved 18,151,842 reports, with 74,143,411 drug entries. We manually checked the first 14,832 terms, up to terms occurring over 200 times (96.88% of total drug entries), to 6282 unique active ingredients. Automatic unchecked translations extend the standardization to 346,854 terms (98.94%). The DiAna dictionary showed a higher sensitivity compared with RxNorm alone, particularly for specific drugs (e.g., rimegepant, adapalene, drospirenone, umeclidinium). The most prominent drug classes in the FAERS were immunomodulating (37.40%) and neurologic drugs (29.19%). Conclusion The DiAna dictionary, as a dynamic open-source tool, provides transparency and flexibility, enabling researchers to actively shape drug definitions during the mapping phase. This empowerment enhances accuracy, reproducibility, and interpretability of results.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele Fusaroli & Valentina Giunchi & Vera Battini & Stefano Puligheddu & Charles Khouri & Carla Carnovale & Emanuel Raschi & Elisabetta Poluzzi, 2024. "Enhancing Transparency in Defining Studied Drugs: The Open-Source Living DiAna Dictionary for Standardizing Drug Names in the FAERS," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 271-284, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01391-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01391-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-023-01391-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-023-01391-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01391-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.