IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v47y2024i1d10.1007_s40264-023-01378-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive Safety is Largely Ignored in Clinical Drug Trials: A Study of Registered Study Protocols

Author

Listed:
  • Arne Reimers

    (Lund University
    Skåne University Hospital)

  • Hanna Ljung

    (Lund University)

Abstract

Background and Objective The number of reports on suspected drug-induced memory impairment submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration increased 30-fold from 2000 to 2022. Drugs are the most common cause of reversible dementia. However, there is very little research on drug-induced cognitive impairment. The aim of this study was to investigate if and how an assessment of cognitive safety was included in recent, registered, controlled, clinical drug trials. Methods The clinical trials registry ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ) was searched for randomized controlled clinical trials with available study protocols. After excluding irrelevant trials such as surgical procedures, local or short-term treatment, and dietary supplements, 803 trials were included in this study. The protocols were manually reviewed for information on if, and how, cognitive safety had been assessed. Trial drugs were categorized into those targeting the central nervous system or not, as well as older and newer drugs. Methods used for the assessment of cognitive function were categorized into questionnaires, screening instruments, and neuropsychological tests. If the trial results were published, we examined whether the publication contained any data on cognitive safety that had emerged from the trial. Results The start dates of the screened trials ranged from 31 July, 2009, to 4 April, 2021. Out of the 803 trials, 52 (6.5%) actively assessed cognitive safety. The remaining trials relied solely on spontaneous reporting. Of 429 trials studying a new drug, 32 (7.5%) actively assessed cognitive safety. One hundred and fifty-eight trials examined drugs intended to, or known to have, pharmacological effects on the central nervous system. Of these, 21 (13.5%) assessed cognitive safety. Most of the trials that assessed cognitive safety used either crude screening tools or questionnaires. Conclusions Cognitive safety is largely ignored by recent controlled clinical trials. This applies even to trials assessing new drugs and trials assessing central nervous system drugs. There is an urgent need for drug manufacturers, regulatory authorities, and the medical profession to address the cognitive safety of drugs.

Suggested Citation

  • Arne Reimers & Hanna Ljung, 2024. "Cognitive Safety is Largely Ignored in Clinical Drug Trials: A Study of Registered Study Protocols," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 23-28, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01378-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01378-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-023-01378-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-023-01378-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01378-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.