IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v47y2024i1d10.1007_s40264-023-01370-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of an Innovative Data Mining Approach Towards Safe Polypharmacy Practice in Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Shi

    (Indiana University)

  • Chien-Wei Chiang

    (The Ohio State University)

  • Kathleen T. Unroe

    (Indiana University
    Regenstrief Institute)

  • Ximena Oyarzun-Gonzalez

    (The Ohio State University)

  • Anna Sun

    (Indiana University)

  • Yuedi Yang

    (Indiana University)

  • Katherine M. Hunold

    (The Ohio State University)

  • Jeffrey Caterino

    (The Ohio State University
    The Ohio State University)

  • Lang Li

    (The Ohio State University)

  • Macarius Donneyong

    (The Ohio State University)

  • Pengyue Zhang

    (Indiana University)

Abstract

Introduction Polypharmacy is common and is associated with higher risk of adverse drug event (ADE) among older adults. Knowledge on the ADE risk level of exposure to different drug combinations is critical for safe polypharmacy practice, while approaches for this type of knowledge discovery are limited. The objective of this study was to apply an innovative data mining approach to discover high-risk and alternative low-risk high-order drug combinations (e.g., three- and four-drug combinations). Methods A cohort of older adults (≥ 65 years) who visited an emergency department (ED) were identified from Medicare fee-for-service and MarketScan Medicare supplemental data. We used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes to identify ADE cases potentially induced by anticoagulants, antidiabetic drugs, and opioids from ED visit records. We assessed drug exposure data during a 30-day window prior to the ED visit dates. We investigated relationships between exposure of drug combinations and ADEs under the case–control setting. We applied the mixture drug-count response model to identify high-order drug combinations associated with an increased risk of ADE. We conducted therapeutic class-based mining to reveal low-risk alternative drug combinations for high-order drug combinations associated with an increased risk of ADE. Results We investigated frequent high-order drug combinations from 8.4 million ED visit records (5.1 million from Medicare data and 3.3 million from MarketScan data). We identified 5213 high-order drug combinations associated with an increased risk of ADE by controlling the false discovery rate at 0.01. We identified 1904 high-order, high-risk drug combinations had potential low-risk alternative drug combinations, where each high-order, high-risk drug combination and its corresponding low-risk alternative drug combination(s) have similar therapeutic classes. Conclusions We demonstrated the application of a data mining technique to discover high-order drug combinations associated with an increased risk of ADE. We identified high-risk, high-order drug combinations often have low-risk alternative drug combinations in similar therapeutic classes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Shi & Chien-Wei Chiang & Kathleen T. Unroe & Ximena Oyarzun-Gonzalez & Anna Sun & Yuedi Yang & Katherine M. Hunold & Jeffrey Caterino & Lang Li & Macarius Donneyong & Pengyue Zhang, 2024. "Application of an Innovative Data Mining Approach Towards Safe Polypharmacy Practice in Older Adults," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 93-102, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01370-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01370-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-023-01370-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-023-01370-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01370-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.