IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v47y2024i1d10.1007_s40264-023-01361-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-Term Safety of Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Disease: An Integrated Analysis of Eleven Phase II/III Clinical Studies in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce Strober

    (Yale University
    Central Connecticut Dermatology Research)

  • Laura C. Coates

    (University of Oxford)

  • Mark G. Lebwohl

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Atul Deodhar

    (Oregon Health & Science University)

  • Evan Leibowitz

    (Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC)

  • Katelyn Rowland

    (Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC)

  • Alexa P. Kollmeier

    (Janssen Research & Development, LLC)

  • Megan Miller

    (Janssen Research & Development, LLC)

  • Yanli Wang

    (Janssen Research & Development, LLC)

  • Shu Li

    (Janssen Research & Development, LLC)

  • Soumya D. Chakravarty

    (Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC
    Drexel University College of Medicine)

  • Daphne Chan

    (Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC)

  • May Shawi

    (Immunology, Janssen Research & Development, LLC)

  • Ya-Wen Yang

    (Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson)

  • Diamant Thaҫi

    (University of Luebeck)

  • Proton Rahman

    (Memorial University of Newfoundland)

Abstract

Introduction The benefit/risk profiles of biologics can be affected by comorbidities, certain demographic characteristics, and concomitant medications; therefore, it is important to evaluate the long-term safety profiles of biologics across broad patient populations. Guselkumab was well tolerated and efficacious across individual pivotal clinical studies in adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and/or active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Objectives The objective of the current analysis was to evaluate guselkumab safety in a large population of patients with psoriatic disease by pooling adverse event (AE) data from 11 phase II/III studies (seven in psoriasis; four in PsA). Methods Guselkumab was generally administered as 100 mg subcutaneous injections at Week 0, Week 4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W) in psoriasis studies and at Week 0, Week 4, then every 4 weeks (Q4W) or Q8W in PsA studies. Safety data were summarized for the placebo-controlled period (Weeks 0–16 in psoriasis; Weeks 0–24 in PsA) and through the end of the reporting period (up to 5 years in psoriasis; up to 2 years in PsA). Using the integrated data, incidence rates of key AEs were determined post hoc, adjusted for duration of follow-up, and reported per 100 patient-years (PYs). AE rates were also determined in subgroups of patients defined by sex, age, body mass index (BMI), and prior biologic use. Results During the placebo-controlled period, 1061 patients received placebo (395 PYs) and 2257 received guselkumab (856 PYs). Through the end of the reporting period, 4399 guselkumab-treated patients contributed 10,787 PYs of follow-up. During the placebo-controlled period, in the guselkumab and placebo groups, respectively, rates of AEs were 281 versus 272/100 PYs, and infections were 76.0 versus 72.2/100 PYs. Rates of serious AEs (5.6 vs. 7.8/100 PYs), AEs leading to discontinuation (4.9 vs. 6.6/100 PYs), serious infections (1.0 vs. 2.3/100 PYs), malignancy (0.59 vs. 0.25 patients/100 PYs), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; 0.35 vs. 0.25/100 PYs) were low and comparable between guselkumab and placebo. Among guselkumab-treated patients, safety event rates through the end of the reporting period were numerically lower than or comparable with rates observed during the placebo-controlled period: AEs, 164/100 PYs; infections, 61.2/100 PYs; serious AEs, 5.4/100 PYs; AEs leading to discontinuation, 1.8/100 PYs; serious infections, 1.0/100 PYs; malignancy, 0.6/100 PYs; and MACE, 0.3/100 PYs. No AEs of Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, or active tuberculosis were reported among guselkumab-treated patients. In the psoriasis studies, no opportunistic infections were reported among guselkumab-treated patients. Three AEs of opportunistic infections were reported in guselkumab-treated patients with PsA (0.14/100 PYs; all after Week 52 in DISCOVER-2). AE rates were largely consistent across subgroups of guselkumab-treated patients defined by sex, age, BMI, and prior biologic use. Conclusions In this analysis of 4399 guselkumab-treated patients with psoriatic disease followed for 10,787 PYs, guselkumab had a favorable AE profile. AE rates were similar between guselkumab- and placebo-treated patients and were consistent throughout long-term guselkumab treatment and across broad subgroups of patients with psoriatic disease. Clinical Trials Registrations Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT01483599, NCT02207231, NCT02207244, NCT02203032, NCT02905331, NCT03090100, NCT02325219, NCT02319759, NCT03162796, NCT03158285, and NCT03796858. Graphical Abstract

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce Strober & Laura C. Coates & Mark G. Lebwohl & Atul Deodhar & Evan Leibowitz & Katelyn Rowland & Alexa P. Kollmeier & Megan Miller & Yanli Wang & Shu Li & Soumya D. Chakravarty & Daphne Chan & Ma, 2024. "Long-Term Safety of Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Disease: An Integrated Analysis of Eleven Phase II/III Clinical Studies in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 39-57, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01361-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01361-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-023-01361-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-023-01361-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01361-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.