IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v46y2023i7d10.1007_s40264-023-01288-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety and Effectiveness of Rasagiline in Chinese Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-interventional Post-marketing Study

Author

Listed:
  • Wen Su

    (Beijing Hospital
    National Center of Gerontology
    Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences)

  • Zhanhua Liang

    (The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University)

  • Wei Mao

    (Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University)

  • Ming Shao

    (The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University)

  • Xingyue Hu

    (Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine)

  • Yuncheng Wu

    (Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine)

  • Wenshi Wei

    (Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University)

  • Zhenguo Liu

    (Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine)

  • Kezhong Zhang

    (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University)

  • Beisha Tang

    (Xiangya Hospital, Central South University)

  • Shuai Cao

    (Lundbeck (Beijing) Pharmaceutical Consulting Co, Ltd.)

  • Zhuolun Song

    (Lundbeck (Beijing) Pharmaceutical Consulting Co, Ltd.)

  • Haibo Chen

    (Beijing Hospital
    National Center of Gerontology
    Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences)

Abstract

Introduction Rasagiline is indicated for treating idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD) as monotherapy and adjunct therapy to levodopa in patients. Objectives To assess the post-marketing safety and tolerability of rasagiline in Chinese PD patients, as well as its effectiveness in improving motor symptoms. Methods This prospective, non-interventional, multicenter, cohort study included PD patients administered rasagiline monotherapy or adjunct therapy to levodopa. The primary outcome was the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) according to MedDRA® (version 22.0), and the secondary outcomes were the Parkinson’s Disease Unified Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III, Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), and Clinical Global Impression-Global-Improvement (CGI-I), assessed at Weeks 4, 12, and 24. Results In total, 734 patients, 95 in the monotherapy subgroup and 639 in the adjunct therapy subgroup, were included in the safety population. The incidence rates of all ADRs were comparable between the monotherapy (15.8%) and adjunct therapy (13.6%) subgroups. The most common ADRs by system organ class were nervous system disorders (5.6%), gastrointestinal disorders (3.3%), psychiatric disorders (1.8%), vascular disorders (1.2%), and general disorders and administration site conditions (1.1%). Five (0.7%) participants experienced 5 serious ADRs. Improvements in UPDRS part III, CGI-S and CGI-I at Weeks 4, 12 and 24 from baseline were observed. Conclusions Safety data in this study indicated no extra safety concerns. Rasagiline is generally safe and well tolerated in Chinese PD patients. The safety profile and tolerability were in line with the established safety profile. Moreover, rasagiline reduced the severity of PD motor symptoms, confirming findings by previous clinical trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen Su & Zhanhua Liang & Wei Mao & Ming Shao & Xingyue Hu & Yuncheng Wu & Wenshi Wei & Zhenguo Liu & Kezhong Zhang & Beisha Tang & Shuai Cao & Zhuolun Song & Haibo Chen, 2023. "Safety and Effectiveness of Rasagiline in Chinese Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-interventional Post-marketing Study," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 46(7), pages 637-646, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:7:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01288-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01288-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-023-01288-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-023-01288-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:7:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01288-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.