IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v46y2023i6d10.1007_s40264-023-01304-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines Among the Paediatric Population: Analysis of the European Surveillance Systems and Pivotal Clinical Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Fariba Ahmadizar

    (University Medical Centre Utrecht)

  • Nicoletta Luxi

    (University of Verona)

  • Monika Raethke

    (Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb)

  • Sandor Schmikli

    (University Medical Centre Utrecht)

  • Fabio Riefolo

    (Partnerships, Barcelona Health Hub)

  • Putri Widi Saraswati

    (University Medical Centre Utrecht)

  • Camelia Bucsa

    (Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy)

  • Alhadi Osman

    (University Medical Centre Utrecht)

  • Megan Liddiard

    (Drug Safety Research Unit)

  • Francisco Batel Maques

    (University of Coimbra)

  • Giuliana Petrelli

    (University of Verona)

  • Simona Sonderlichová

    (Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice)

  • Nicolas H. Thurin

    (Univ. Bordeaux)

  • Felipe Villalobos

    (Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l’Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol))

  • Gianluca Trifirò

    (University of Verona)

  • Miriam Sturkenboom

    (University Medical Centre Utrecht)

Abstract

Background and Objectives The European Medicine Agency extended the use of Comirnaty, Spikevax, and Nuvaxovid in paediatrics; thus, these vaccines require additional real-world safety evidence. Herein, we aimed to monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines through Covid-19 Vaccine Monitor (CVM) and EudraVigilance surveillance systems and the published pivotal clinical trials. Methods In a prospective cohort of vaccinees aged between 5 and 17 years, we measured the frequency of commonly reported (local/systemic solicited) and serious adverse drug events (ADRs) following the first and second doses of COVID-19 vaccines in Europe using data from the CVM cohort until April 2022. The results of previous pivotal clinical trials and data in the EudraVigilance were also analysed. Results The CVM study enrolled 658 first-dose vaccinees (children aged 5–11 years; n = 250 and adolescents aged 12–17 years; n = 408). Local/systemic solicited ADRs were common, whereas serious ADRs were uncommon. Among Comirnaty first and second dose recipients, 28.8% and 17.1% of children and 54.2% and 52.2% of adolescents experienced at least one ADR, respectively; injection-site pain (29.2% and 20.7%), fatigue (16.1% and 12.8%), and headache (22.1% and 19.3%) were the most frequent local and systemic ADRs. Results were consistent but slightly lower than in pivotal clinical trials. Reporting rates in Eudravigilance were lower by a factor of 1000. Conclusions The CVM study showed high frequencies of local solicited reactions after vaccination but lower rates than in pivotal clinical trials. Injection-site pain, fatigue, and headache were the most commonly reported ADRs for clinical trials, but higher than spontaneously reported data.

Suggested Citation

  • Fariba Ahmadizar & Nicoletta Luxi & Monika Raethke & Sandor Schmikli & Fabio Riefolo & Putri Widi Saraswati & Camelia Bucsa & Alhadi Osman & Megan Liddiard & Francisco Batel Maques & Giuliana Petrelli, 2023. "Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines Among the Paediatric Population: Analysis of the European Surveillance Systems and Pivotal Clinical Trials," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 575-585, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01304-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01304-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-023-01304-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-023-01304-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01304-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.