IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v46y2023i6d10.1007_s40264-023-01303-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facilitators and Barriers to Uptake of the Med Safety Mobile App for Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting by Health Workers in Uganda: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ronald Kiguba

    (Makerere University)

  • Henry Zakumumpa

    (Makerere University)

  • Helen B. Ndagije

    (National Drug Authority)

  • Norah Mwebaza

    (Makerere University)

  • Ronald Ssenyonga

    (Makerere University)

  • Phil Tregunno

    (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency)

  • Kendal Harrison

    (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency)

  • Munir Pirmohamed

    (University of Liverpool)

Abstract

Introduction Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are an important public health challenge worldwide; however, pharmacovigilance systems are plagued by under-reporting. Mobile technologies, including mobile applications such as Med Safety, could strengthen ADR reporting. We explored the acceptability, and factors that could influence uptake of, Med Safety for ADR reporting by health workers in Uganda. Methods The study took place between July and September 2020 in 12 HIV clinics in Uganda and employed a qualitative exploratory research design. We conducted 22 in-depth interviews and 3 mixed-gender focus group discussions (49 participants) with a diverse range of health workers. We analysed the data using a thematic approach. Results There was goodwill among the health workers to adopt Med Safety for ADR reporting and the majority would recommend the app to other health workers. Training with practice increased acceptability of the app. Uptake of the app was favoured by the younger, technology proficient, health worker demographic; the app's offline and two-way risk communication functionalities; availability of free internet hotspots at some health facilities; goodwill and willingness of health workers to report ADRs; and the cumbersome nature of conventional ADR reporting tools. Potential barriers to the uptake of Med Safety were the perceived lengthy processes of initial app registration and completion of multiple screens during ADR reporting; challenges with health workers’ smartphones (incompatibility with application, no space for more applications, low battery charge); high cost of internet data; poor internet connectivity; difficulty in recognising ADRs, language barrier and poor feedback to ADR reporters. Conclusion There was goodwill among the health workers to adopt Med Safety for ADR reporting and the majority would recommend the app to other health workers. Training with practice increased acceptability of the app and should be integral in all future app roll-out campaigns. The identified facilitators and barriers could be used to appropriately guide future research and implementation to promote the uptake of Med Safety for pharmacovigilance in low- and middle-income countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald Kiguba & Henry Zakumumpa & Helen B. Ndagije & Norah Mwebaza & Ronald Ssenyonga & Phil Tregunno & Kendal Harrison & Munir Pirmohamed, 2023. "Facilitators and Barriers to Uptake of the Med Safety Mobile App for Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting by Health Workers in Uganda: A Qualitative Study," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 565-574, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01303-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01303-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-023-01303-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-023-01303-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sieta T. Vries & Lisa Wong & Alastair Sutcliffe & François Houÿez & Carmen Lasheras Ruiz & Peter G. M. Mol, 2017. "Factors Influencing the Use of a Mobile App for Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions and Receiving Safety Information: A Qualitative Study," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 40(5), pages 443-455, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joanne Barnes & Jane L. Sheridan & Christine Yang Dong & Linda Härmark & Sunita Vohra & Mira Harrison-Woolrych, 2020. "Evaluation of a Web-Based, ‘Purchase Event’ Intensive Monitoring Method for Pharmacovigilance of Natural Health Products: Lessons and Insights from Development Work in New Zealand," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 43(10), pages 981-998, October.
    2. Sieta T. de Vries & Judy Harrison & Patrick Revelle & Alicia Ptaszynska-Neophytou & Anna Radecka & Gowthamei Ragunathan & Phil Tregunno & Petra Denig & Peter G. M. Mol, 2019. "Use of a Patient-Friendly Terms List in the Adverse Drug Reaction Report Form: A Database Study," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(7), pages 881-886, July.
    3. Sieta T. de Vries & Petra Denig & Carmen Lasheras Ruiz & François Houÿez & Lisa Wong & Alastair Sutcliffe & Peter G. M. Mol, 2018. "Interest in a Mobile App for Two-Way Risk Communication: A Survey Study Among European Healthcare Professionals and Patients," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 41(7), pages 697-712, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01303-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.