IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v46y2023i4d10.1007_s40264-023-01281-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cohort Event Monitoring of Adverse Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines in Seven European Countries: Pooled Results on First Dose

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Raethke

    (Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb)

  • Florence Hunsel

    (Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb)

  • Nicolas H. Thurin

    (Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC-P 1401, Univ. Bordeaux)

  • Caroline Dureau-Pournin

    (Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC-P 1401, Univ. Bordeaux)

  • Dirk Mentzer

    (Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines)

  • Barbara Kovačić

    (Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of Croatia (HALMED))

  • Nikica Mirošević Skvrce

    (Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of Croatia (HALMED))

  • Evelien Clercq

    (Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products (FAMHP))

  • Martine Sabbe

    (Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products (FAMHP))

  • Gianluca Trifirò

    (University of Verona)

  • Nicoletta Luxi

    (University of Verona)

  • Alexia Giovanazzi

    (University of Verona)

  • Saad Shakir

    (Drug Safety Research Unit)

  • Olaf H. Klungel

    (Utrecht University)

  • Sandor Schmikli

    (University Medical Centre Utrecht)

  • Miriam Sturkenboom

    (Utrecht University)

Abstract

Introduction COVID-19 vaccines were rapidly authorised, thus requiring intense post-marketing re-evaluation of their benefit-risk profile. A multi-national European collaboration was established with the aim to prospectively monitor safety of the COVID-19 vaccines through web-based survey of vaccinees. Methods A prospective cohort event monitoring study was conducted with primary consented data collection in seven European countries. Through the web applications, participants received and completed baseline and up to six follow-up questionnaires on self-reported adverse reactions for at least 6 months following the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine (Netherlands, France, Belgium, UK, Italy) and baseline and up to ten follow-up questionnaires for one year in Germany and Croatia. Rates of adverse reactions have been described by type (solicited, non-solicited; serious/non-serious; and adverse events of special interest) and stratified by vaccine brand. We calculated the frequency of adverse reaction after dose 1 and prior to dose 2 among all vaccinees who completed at least one follow-up questionnaire. Results Overall, 117,791 participants were included and completed the first questionnaire in addition to the baseline: 88,196 (74.9%) from Germany, 27,588 (23.4%) from Netherlands, 984 (0.8%) from France, 570 (0.5%) from Italy, 326 (0.3%) from Croatia, 89 (0.1%) from the UK and 38 (0.03%) from Belgium. There were 89,377 (75.9%) respondents who had received AstraZeneca vaccines, 14,658 (12.4%) BioNTech/Pfizer, 11,266 (9.6%) Moderna and 2490 (2.1%) Janssen vaccines as a first dose. Median age category was 40–49 years for all vaccines except for Pfizer where median age was 70–79 years. Most vaccinees were female with a female-to-male ratio of 1.34, 1.96 and 2.50 for AstraZeneca, Moderna and Janssen, respectively. BioNtech/Pfizer had slightly more men with a ratio of 0.82. Fatigue and headache were the most commonly reported solicited systemic adverse reactions and injection-site pain was the most common solicited local reaction. The rates of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were 0.1–0.2% across all vaccine brands. Conclusion This large-scale prospective study of COVID-19 vaccine recipients showed, for all the studied vaccines, a high frequency of systemic reactions, related to the immunogenic response, and local reactions at the injection site, while serious reactions or AESIs were uncommon, consistent with those reported on product labels. This study demonstrated the feasibility of setting up and conducting cohort event monitoring across multiple European countries to collect safety data on novel vaccines that are rolled out at scale in populations which may not have been included in pivotal trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Raethke & Florence Hunsel & Nicolas H. Thurin & Caroline Dureau-Pournin & Dirk Mentzer & Barbara Kovačić & Nikica Mirošević Skvrce & Evelien Clercq & Martine Sabbe & Gianluca Trifirò & Nicolett, 2023. "Cohort Event Monitoring of Adverse Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines in Seven European Countries: Pooled Results on First Dose," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 391-404, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01281-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01281-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-023-01281-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-023-01281-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robin E. Ferner & Richard J. Stevens & Christopher Anton & Jeffrey K. Aronson, 2022. "Spontaneous Reporting to Regulatory Authorities of Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines Over Time: The Effect of Publicity," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 137-144, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ingrid Oosterhuis & Joep Scholl & Eugène Puijenbroek & Agnes Kant & Florence Hunsel, 2023. "Optimizing Safety Surveillance for COVID-19 Vaccines at the National Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb: One Year of COVID-19 Vaccine Experience," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 65-75, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01281-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.