IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v46y2023i4d10.1007_s40264-023-01274-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preventable Deaths Involving Medicines: A Systematic Case Series of Coroners’ Reports 2013–22

Author

Listed:
  • Harrison S. France

    (University of Oxford)

  • Jeffrey K. Aronson

    (University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter)

  • Carl Heneghan

    (University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter)

  • Robin E. Ferner

    (West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions
    University of Birmingham)

  • Anthony R. Cox

    (West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions
    University of Birmingham)

  • Georgia C. Richards

    (University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter)

Abstract

Introduction Medicines cause over 1700 preventable deaths annually in England. Coroners’ Prevention of Future Death reports (PFDs) are produced in response to preventable deaths to facilitate change. The information in PFDs may help reduce medicine-related preventable deaths. Objectives We aimed to identify medicine-related deaths in coroners’ reports and to explore concerns to prevent future deaths. Methods We carried out a retrospective case series of PFDs across England and Wales, dated between 1 July, 2013 and 23 February, 2022, collected from the UK’s Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website using web scraping, generating an openly available database: https://preventabledeathstracker.net/ . We used descriptive techniques and content analysis to assess the main outcome criteria: the proportion of PFDs in which coroners reported that a therapeutic medicine or drug of abuse had caused or contributed to a death; the characteristics of included PFDs; coroners’ concerns; the recipients of PFDs; and the timeliness of their responses. Results There were 704 PFDs (18%; 716 deaths) that involved medicines, representing an estimated 19,740 years of life lost (average of 50 years lost per death). Opioids (22%), antidepressants (9.7%), and hypnotics (9.2%) were the most common drugs involved. Coroners expressed 1249 concerns, primarily around the major themes of patient safety (29%) and communication (26%), including minor themes of failures of monitoring (10%) and poor communication between organizations (7.5%). Most expected responses to PFDs (51%; 630/1245) were not reported on the UK’s Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website. Conclusions One in five coroner-reported preventable deaths involved medicines. Addressing coroners’ concerns, including problems with patient safety and communication, should reduce harms from medicines. Despite concerns being raised repeatedly, half of the PFD recipients failed to respond, suggesting that lessons are not generally learned. The rich information in PFDs should be used to foster a learning environment in clinical practice that may help reduce preventable deaths. Clinical Trial Registration https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TX3CS .

Suggested Citation

  • Harrison S. France & Jeffrey K. Aronson & Carl Heneghan & Robin E. Ferner & Anthony R. Cox & Georgia C. Richards, 2023. "Preventable Deaths Involving Medicines: A Systematic Case Series of Coroners’ Reports 2013–22," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 335-342, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01274-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01274-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-023-01274-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-023-01274-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01274-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.