IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v46y2023i3d10.1007_s40264-022-01270-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Factors Make EU Regulators Want to Communicate Drug Safety Issues Related to SGLT2 Inhibitors? An Online Survey Study

Author

Listed:
  • Sonia Roldan Munoz

    (University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen)

  • Douwe Postmus

    (University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen)

  • Sieta T. Vries

    (University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
    Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board)

  • Liana Gross-Martirosyan

    (Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board)

  • Priya Bahri

    (European Medicines Agency)

  • Hans Hillege

    (University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
    Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board)

  • Peter G. M. Mol

    (University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
    Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board)

Abstract

Introduction Previous studies have found differences in the communication of safety issues among medicines regulatory agencies. Objectives To explore (1) to what extent regulators’ opinions regarding the need to communicate safety issues related to sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors might be influenced by their concern about the safety issue, and (2) whether regulators’ concerns might be influenced by certain characteristics of the safety issue or by the demographic and professional characteristics and attitudes of the regulators. Methods An online cross-sectional survey study with a rating-based conjoint analysis among clinical and pharmacovigilance assessors from the EU regulatory network was performed between April and June 2021. Regulators were invited by email, and participants were asked about their level of concern and their opinion regarding the need to communicate about 12 scenarios defined by four characteristics: adverse drug reaction, source of information, causality, and frequency. The outcomes for the first objective were to update the summary of product characteristics (SmPC; yes/no) and to send direct healthcare professional communications (DHPC; yes/no). The determinant was regulators’ level of concern (range 0–100%). The outcome of the second objective was regulators’ level of concern, and the determinants were the characteristics of the safety issue, demographic and professional characteristics, and attitudes of the regulators (beliefs about medicines and risk perception). Results A total of 222 regulators completed the survey (64% women; mean age 46 ± 10 years). Depending on the scenario, 54–94% and 25–74% of the participants would update the SmPC or send a DHPC, respectively. The participants’ level of concern influenced their opinions regarding the need to update the SmPC and send a DHPC (odds ratio (OR) 13.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.8–21.7 and OR 13.6; 95% CI 9.5–19.2, respectively, for every 10% increase in the level of concern). All characteristics of the safety issue influenced the level of concern. Younger participants, women, and those working for Eastern European agencies had a higher level of concern than older participants, men, and those working in other regions. Beliefs about medicines and general risk perception also influenced their concern. Conclusions The opinion regarding the need to communicate safety issues was influenced by the concern of regulators. Regulators’ concern was influenced by the characteristics of the safety issue, demographic characteristics, and attitudes. Diverse groups of experts regarding such factors would ensure that various views are incorporated in risk communication decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonia Roldan Munoz & Douwe Postmus & Sieta T. Vries & Liana Gross-Martirosyan & Priya Bahri & Hans Hillege & Peter G. M. Mol, 2023. "What Factors Make EU Regulators Want to Communicate Drug Safety Issues Related to SGLT2 Inhibitors? An Online Survey Study," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 243-255, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01270-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-022-01270-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-022-01270-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-022-01270-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01270-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.