IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v46y2023i3d10.1007_s40264-022-01267-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Safety Analysis of Opioid Agonist Treatment in Pregnant Women with Opioid Use Disorder: A Population-Based Study

Author

Listed:
  • Shuang Wang

    (University of Rhode Island)

  • Kimford J. Meador

    (Stanford University)

  • Jayne Pawasauskas

    (University of Rhode Island)

  • Adam K. Lewkowitz

    (Alpert Medical School of Brown University)

  • Kristina E. Ward

    (University of Rhode Island)

  • Todd N. Brothers

    (University of Rhode Island)

  • Abraham Hartzema

    (University of Florida)

  • Brian J. Quilliam

    (University of Rhode Island)

  • Xuerong Wen

    (University of Rhode Island)

Abstract

Introduction and Objective Receipt of opioid agonist treatment during early and late pregnancy for opioid use disorder may relate to varying perinatal risks. We aimed to assess the effect of time-varying prenatal exposure to opioid agonist treatment using buprenorphine or methadone on adverse neonatal and pregnancy outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women with opioid use disorder using Rhode Island Medicaid claims data and vital statistics during 2008–16. Time-varying exposure was evaluated in early (0–20 weeks) and late (≥ 21 weeks) pregnancy. Marginal structural models with inverse probability of treatment weighting were applied. Results Of 400 eligible pregnancies, 85 and 137 individuals received buprenorphine and methadone, respectively, during early pregnancy. Compared with 152 untreated pregnancies with opioid use disorders, methadone exposure in both periods was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07–5.95), low birth weight (aOR: 2.99; 95% CI 1.34–6.66), neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR, 5.04; 95% CI 2.49–10.21), neonatal abstinence syndrome (aOR: 11.36; 95% CI 5.65–22.82), respiratory symptoms (aOR, 2.71; 95% CI 1.17–6.24), and maternal hospital stay > 7 days (aOR, 14.51; 95% CI 7.23–29.12). Similar patterns emerged for buprenorphine regarding neonatal abstinence syndrome (aOR: 10.27; 95% CI 4.91–21.47) and extended maternal hospital stay (aOR: 3.84; 95% CI 1.83–8.07). However, differences were found favoring the use of buprenorphine for preterm birth versus untreated pregnancies (aOR: 0.17; 95% CI 0.04–0.77), and for several outcomes versus methadone. Conclusions Methadone and buprenorphine prescribed for the treatment of opioid use disorder during pregnancy are associated with varying perinatal risks. However, buprenorphine may be preferred in the setting of pregnancy opioid agonist treatment. Further research is necessary to confirm our findings and minimize residual confounding.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuang Wang & Kimford J. Meador & Jayne Pawasauskas & Adam K. Lewkowitz & Kristina E. Ward & Todd N. Brothers & Abraham Hartzema & Brian J. Quilliam & Xuerong Wen, 2023. "Comparative Safety Analysis of Opioid Agonist Treatment in Pregnant Women with Opioid Use Disorder: A Population-Based Study," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 257-271, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01267-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-022-01267-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-022-01267-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-022-01267-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01267-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.