IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v46y2023i2d10.1007_s40264-022-01261-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of ICD-10-CM-based Algorithms for Date of Last Menstrual Period, Pregnancy Outcomes, and Infant Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea K. Chomistek

    (Optum)

  • Kelesitse Phiri

    (Optum)

  • Michael C. Doherty

    (Optum)

  • Jenna F. Calderbank

    (Optum)

  • Stephanie E. Chiuve

    (AbbVie, Inc)

  • Brenda Hinman McIlroy

    (AbbVie, Inc)

  • Michael C. Snabes

    (AbbVie, Inc)

  • Cheryl Enger

    (Optum)

  • John D. Seeger

    (Optum)

Abstract

Introduction and Objective Validation studies of algorithms for pregnancy outcomes based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes are important for conducting drug safety research using administrative claims databases. To facilitate the conduct of pregnancy safety studies, this exploratory study aimed to develop and validate ICD-10-CM-based claims algorithms for date of last menstrual period (LMP) and pregnancy outcomes using medical records. Methods Using a mother-infant–linked claims database, the study included women with a pregnancy between 2016–2017 and their infants. Claims-based algorithms for LMP date utilized codes for gestational age (Z3A codes). The primary outcomes were major congenital malformations (MCMs) and spontaneous abortion; additional secondary outcomes were also evaluated. Each pregnancy outcome was identified using a claims-based simple algorithm, defined as presence of ≥ 1 claim for the outcome. Positive predictive values (PPV) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results Overall, 586 medical records were sought and 365 (62.3%) were adjudicated, including 125 records each for MCMs and spontaneous abortion. Last menstrual period date was validated among maternal charts procured for pregnancy outcomes and fewer charts were adjudicated for the secondary outcomes. The median difference in days between LMP date based on Z3A codes and adjudicated LMP date was 4.0 (interquartile range: 2.0–10.0). The PPV of the simple algorithm for spontaneous abortion was 84.7% (95% CI 78.3, 91.2). The PPV for the MCM algorithm was 70%. Conclusions The ICD-10-CM claims-based algorithm for spontaneous abortion performed well and may be used in pregnancy studies. Further algorithm refinement for MCMs is needed. The algorithms for LMP date and the secondary outcomes would benefit from additional validation in a larger sample.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea K. Chomistek & Kelesitse Phiri & Michael C. Doherty & Jenna F. Calderbank & Stephanie E. Chiuve & Brenda Hinman McIlroy & Michael C. Snabes & Cheryl Enger & John D. Seeger, 2023. "Development and Validation of ICD-10-CM-based Algorithms for Date of Last Menstrual Period, Pregnancy Outcomes, and Infant Outcomes," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 209-222, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01261-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-022-01261-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-022-01261-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-022-01261-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01261-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.