IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v46y2023i12d10.1007_s40264-023-01357-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pulmonary Toxicity Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-Based Therapy: Current Perspectives and Future Directions

Author

Listed:
  • Baohui Hong

    (Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
    The Second Hospital of Sanming
    Fujian Medical University)

  • Jiabing Zheng

    (Fujian Medical University Union Hospital)

  • Rong Chen

    (The Second Hospital of Sanming)

  • Caiyun Zheng

    (Fuqing City Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University
    Fujian Medical University)

  • Bin Du

    (Fujian Medical University Union Hospital)

  • Ruping Ni

    (Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
    Fujian Medical University)

  • Jing Yang

    (Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
    Fujian Medical University)

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown efficacy in tumor therapy. However, the risk of pulmonary toxicity from ICI-based treatment regimens remains unknown. We searched multiple databases and clinical trial websites from January 2015 to December 2021 and summarized the pulmonary toxicity profile and risk ranking of ICI-based treatments in cancer patients. We included a Phase III randomized clinical trial (RCT) in which the treatment group received at least one ICI and experienced pulmonary adverse events (PAEs). Our study, which included 104 RCTs, found the highest incidence of grades 1–2 and 3–5 treatment-associated PAEs (Tr-PAEs) in programmed death 1 (PD-1)+ chemotherapy and PD-1+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), respectively. The first incidence rates of grades 1–2 and 3–5 immune-mediated PAEs (Im-PAEs) were PD1+CTLA-4+ chemotherapy and PD-L1 + CTLA4, respectively. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 + chemotherapy regimen and PD-L1+ targeted therapy drug (TTD)+ chemotherapy regimen had the highest risk of developing grades 1–2 and 3–5 Tr-PAEs. Programmed death-L1+ CTLA-4 has a higher risk of grade 3–5 Tr-PAEs than PD-L1. The risk of grade 1–2 pulmonary toxicity was significantly different in the high-dose and low-dose groups of nivolumab and atezolizumab. Nivolumab and atezolizumab induced dose-dependent grade 1–2 pulmonary toxicity. Among single-agent regimens, PD-1 showed the greatest grade 1–2 pulmonary toxicity. Programmed death-L1+ TTD+ chemotherapy showed the greatest grade 3–5 pulmonary toxicity in combination therapy. PD-L1+ TTD+ chemotherapy was associated with a higher risk of grade 3–5 Tr-PAEs and a lower risk of Im-PAEs. We recommend a targeted approach to managing PAE.

Suggested Citation

  • Baohui Hong & Jiabing Zheng & Rong Chen & Caiyun Zheng & Bin Du & Ruping Ni & Jing Yang, 2023. "Pulmonary Toxicity Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-Based Therapy: Current Perspectives and Future Directions," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 46(12), pages 1313-1322, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:12:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01357-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01357-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-023-01357-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-023-01357-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:12:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01357-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.