IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v46y2023i10d10.1007_s40264-023-01339-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automated Classification of Quality Defect Issues Relating to Substandard Medicines Using a Hybrid Machine Learning and Rule-Based Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Desmond Chun Hwee Teo

    (Health Sciences Authority)

  • Yiting Huang

    (Health Sciences Authority)

  • Sreemanee Raaj Dorajoo

    (Health Sciences Authority)

  • Michelle Sau Yuen Ng

    (Health Sciences Authority)

  • Chih Tzer Choong

    (Health Sciences Authority)

  • Doris Sock Tin Phuah

    (Health Sciences Authority)

  • Dorothy Hooi Myn Tan

    (Health Sciences Authority)

  • Filina Meixuan Tan

    (Health Sciences Authority)

  • Huilin Huang

    (Health Sciences Authority)

  • Maggie Siok Hwee Tan

    (Health Sciences Authority)

  • Suan Tian Koh

    (Health Sciences Authority)

  • Jalene Wang Woon Poh

    (Health Sciences Authority)

  • Pei San Ang

    (Health Sciences Authority)

Abstract

Background and Objective Substandard medicines can lead to serious safety issues affecting public health; however, the nature of such issues can be widely heterogeneous. Health product regulators seek to prioritise critical product quality defects for review to ensure that prompt risk mitigation measures are taken. This study aims to classify the nature of issues for substandard medicines using machine learning to augment a risk-based and timely review of cases. Methods A combined machine learning algorithm with a keyword-based model was developed to classify quality issues using text relating to substandard medicines (CISTERM). The nature of issues for product defect cases were classified based on Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities–Health Sciences Authority (MedDRA–HSA) lowest-level terms. Results Product defect cases received from January 2010 to December 2021 were used for training (n = 11,082) and for testing (n = 2771). The machine learning model achieved a good recall (precision) of 92% (96%) for ‘Product adulterated and/or contains prohibited substance’, 86% (90%) for ‘Out of specification or out of trend test result’ and 90% (91%) for ‘Manufacturing non-compliance’. Conclusion Post-market surveillance of substandard medicines remains a key activity for drug regulatory authorities. A combined machine learning algorithm with keyword-based model can help to prioritise the review of product quality defect issues in a timely manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Desmond Chun Hwee Teo & Yiting Huang & Sreemanee Raaj Dorajoo & Michelle Sau Yuen Ng & Chih Tzer Choong & Doris Sock Tin Phuah & Dorothy Hooi Myn Tan & Filina Meixuan Tan & Huilin Huang & Maggie Siok , 2023. "Automated Classification of Quality Defect Issues Relating to Substandard Medicines Using a Hybrid Machine Learning and Rule-Based Approach," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 46(10), pages 975-989, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01339-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01339-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-023-01339-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-023-01339-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:46:y:2023:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-023-01339-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.