IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v45y2022i9d10.1007_s40264-022-01213-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in the Recurrence Rate of Immediate Adverse Drug Reactions According to the Components of Alternative Contrast Media: Analysis of Repetitive Computed Tomography Cases in a Single Tertiary Hospital

Author

Listed:
  • Sung-Ryeol Kim

    (Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)

  • Nak-Hoon Son

    (Keimyung University)

  • Hye Jung Park

    (Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)

  • Kyung Hee Park

    (Yonsei University College of Medicine
    Yonsei University College of Medicine)

  • Jung-Won Park

    (Yonsei University College of Medicine
    Yonsei University College of Medicine)

  • Jae-Hyun Lee

    (Yonsei University College of Medicine
    Yonsei University College of Medicine)

Abstract

Introduction The recurrence rates of immediate adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to the alternative radiocontrast media (RCM) are not well known. Previous studies suggest selection of alternative RCM considering carbamoyl side chains; however, its usefulness for preventing the recurrence of ADRs has not been clearly verified. Objective The aim of this study was to verify the recurrence rate of immediate ADRs according to the alternative RCM. Method This retrospective study analyzed 6420 contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) cases of 2009 patients registered in the ADR system from 861,664 CT cases in a single tertiary hospital between 2015 and 2020. Iohexol, iopromide, iobitridol, and iopamidol were used for CT. According to the carbamoyl side chains present, iohexol belongs to group 1, iopromide belongs to groups 1 and 2, iobitridol belongs to group 2, and iopamidol belongs to group 3. Results Replacing iobitridol with iopamidol (odds ratio [OR] 2.595, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48–4.550) or iopromide (OR 3.354, 95% CI 1.420–7.926) as the subsequent RCM was associated with increased recurrence, while replacing iopamidol with iobitridol (OR 0.506, 95% CI 0.282–0.908) and iopromide with iohexol (OR 0.355, 95% CI 0.177–0.711) was associated with decreased recurrence. Other changes did not influence the recurrence of ADRs. Conclusions The recurrence of immediate ADRs increased in certain RCM combinations of preceding and subsequent CT scans, and the RCMs did not show cross-reactivity. Therefore, the clinical benefit of the alternative RCM considering cross-reactivity is limited. This result suggests that the side chains of RCM do not have an important role in the recurrence of immediate ADRs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung-Ryeol Kim & Nak-Hoon Son & Hye Jung Park & Kyung Hee Park & Jung-Won Park & Jae-Hyun Lee, 2022. "Differences in the Recurrence Rate of Immediate Adverse Drug Reactions According to the Components of Alternative Contrast Media: Analysis of Repetitive Computed Tomography Cases in a Single Tertiary ," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 45(9), pages 995-1002, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:9:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01213-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-022-01213-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-022-01213-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-022-01213-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:9:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01213-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.