IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v45y2022i7d10.1007_s40264-022-01193-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incidence of Acute Renal Failure in Patients Using Levetiracetam Versus Other Antiseizure Medications: A Voluntary Post-Authorization Safety Study

Author

Listed:
  • Raphaelle Beau-Lejdstrom

    (UCB Pharma)

  • Lai San Hong

    (Redsen Limited)

  • Xabier Garcia de Albeniz

    (RTI Health Solutions)

  • Florin Floricel

    (UCB Pharma)

  • Johan Lorenzen

    (University Hospital Zurich)

  • Francois Bonfitto

    (UCB Pharma)

  • Linda Kalilani

    (UCB Pharma)

  • Christian Loesch

    (UCB Pharma)

  • Graham Luscombe

    (UCB Pharma)

  • Susana Perez-Gutthann

    (RTI Health Solutions)

  • Isabelle Mottet

    (UCB Pharma)

  • Nadia Foskett

    (UCB Pharma)

Abstract

Introduction Acute kidney injury is an expected adverse drug reaction listed in the European Union (EU) Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) for levetiracetam, one of the most widely used modern antiseizure medications (ASMs). Objective We conducted a voluntary post-authorization safety study to characterize the rate of acute renal failure (ARF) in patients exposed to levetiracetam versus other ASMs. Methods New users of ASMs without prior renal dysfunction were identified and followed for 30 days in the IBM® MarketScan® database (USA, January 2008–December 2017). ARF was defined as a diagnosis on inpatient or emergency department claims. We estimated adjusted incidence rates, incidence rate ratios (IRRs), and incidence rate differences (IRDs) of ARF in patients initiating levetiracetam versus other ASMs. Results Overall, 110,336 patients were eligible for the monotherapy cohort and 96,215 were eligible for the polytherapy cohort. The overall crude rate of ARF following a new ASM was 6.0 and 6.5 per 10,000 patients for the ‘monotherapy’ and ‘polytherapy’ cohorts, respectively, in the first 30 days after the index date. In the monotherapy cohort, the IRR for ARF was 1.37 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80–2.34) and the corresponding IRD was 2.0 (95% CI − 1.12 to 5.12) additional ARFs per 10,000 patient-months. In the polytherapy cohort, the adjusted IRR for ARF was 0.94 (95% CI 0.51–1.74) and the corresponding IRD was − 0.42 cases per 10,000 patient-months (95% CI − 4.01 to 3.17). Conclusions The rate of ARFs in ASM new users was very low. In patients without prior ASMs, the estimated difference in risk of ARF associated with initiation of levetiracetam versus initiation of other ASMs was small, with 95% CIs compatible with small protective or harmful effects. In patients receiving polytherapy, the difference was compatible with the null and the 95% CI with small protective or harmful effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Raphaelle Beau-Lejdstrom & Lai San Hong & Xabier Garcia de Albeniz & Florin Floricel & Johan Lorenzen & Francois Bonfitto & Linda Kalilani & Christian Loesch & Graham Luscombe & Susana Perez-Gutthann , 2022. "Incidence of Acute Renal Failure in Patients Using Levetiracetam Versus Other Antiseizure Medications: A Voluntary Post-Authorization Safety Study," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 45(7), pages 781-790, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:7:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01193-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-022-01193-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-022-01193-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-022-01193-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:7:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01193-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.