IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v45y2022i5d10.1007_s40264-022-01162-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automated Drug Coding Using Artificial Intelligence: An Evaluation of WHODrug Koda on Adverse Event Reports

Author

Listed:
  • Eva-Lisa Meldau

    (Uppsala Monitoring Centre)

  • Shachi Bista

    (Uppsala Monitoring Centre)

  • Emma Rofors

    (Uppsala Monitoring Centre)

  • Lucie M. Gattepaille

    (Uppsala Monitoring Centre)

Abstract

Introduction Coding medicinal products described on adverse event (AE) reports to specific entries in standardised drug dictionaries, such as WHODrug Global, is a time-consuming step in case processing activities despite its potential for automation. Many organisations are already partially automating drug coding using text-processing methods and synonym lists, however addressing challenges such as misspellings, abbreviations or ambiguous trade names requires more advanced methods. WHODrug Koda is a drug coding engine using text-processing algorithms, built-in coding rules and machine learning to code drug verbatims to WHODrug Global. Objective Our aim was to evaluate the drug coding performance of WHODrug Koda on AE reports from VigiBase, the World Health Organization’s global database of individual case safety reports, in terms of level of automation and coding quality. Methods Koda was evaluated on 4.8 million drug entries from VigiBase. Automation level was computed as the proportion of drug entries automatically coded by Koda and was compared to a simple case-insensitive text-matching algorithm. Coding quality was evaluated in terms of coding accuracy, by comparing Koda’s prediction to the WHODrug entries found on the AE reports in VigiBase. To better understand the cases in which Koda’s coding results did not match with the WHODrug entries in VigiBase, a manual assessment of 600 samples of disagreeing encodings was performed by two teams of expert drug coders. Results Compared with a simple direct-match baseline, Koda can increase the automation level from 61% to 89%, while providing high coding quality with an accuracy of 97%. Conclusions Even though Koda was designed for use in clinical trials, Koda achieves automation level and coding quality for drug coding of AE reports comparable with the performance observed in a previous evaluation of Koda on clinical trial data. Koda can thus help organisations to automate their drug coding of AE reports to a large degree.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva-Lisa Meldau & Shachi Bista & Emma Rofors & Lucie M. Gattepaille, 2022. "Automated Drug Coding Using Artificial Intelligence: An Evaluation of WHODrug Koda on Adverse Event Reports," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 549-561, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01162-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-022-01162-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-022-01162-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-022-01162-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01162-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.