IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v45y2022i5d10.1007_s40264-022-01153-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of Artificial Intelligence to Support the Automatic Coding of Patient Adverse Drug Reaction Reports, Using Nationwide Pharmacovigilance Data

Author

Listed:
  • Guillaume L. Martin

    (Synapse Medicine
    Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière)

  • Julien Jouganous

    (Synapse Medicine)

  • Romain Savidan

    (Synapse Medicine)

  • Axel Bellec

    (Synapse Medicine)

  • Clément Goehrs

    (Synapse Medicine)

  • Mehdi Benkebil

    (Surveillance Division, Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (ANSM))

  • Ghada Miremont

    (University of Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, U1219, Team Pharmacoepidemiology
    CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, Centre de Pharmacovigilance de Bordeaux)

  • Joëlle Micallef

    (CRPV Marseille Provence Corse, Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Pharmacologie Clinique et Pharmacovigilance, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille
    Aix Marseille Université, Institut des Neurosciences des Systèmes, INSERM 1106)

  • Francesco Salvo

    (University of Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, U1219, Team Pharmacoepidemiology
    CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, Centre de Pharmacovigilance de Bordeaux)

  • Antoine Pariente

    (University of Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, U1219, Team Pharmacoepidemiology
    CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, Centre de Pharmacovigilance de Bordeaux)

  • Louis Létinier

    (Synapse Medicine
    University of Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, U1219, Team Pharmacoepidemiology
    CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, Centre de Pharmacovigilance de Bordeaux)

Abstract

Introduction Adverse drug reaction reports are usually manually assessed by pharmacovigilance experts to detect safety signals associated with drugs. With the recent extension of reporting to patients and the emergence of mass media-related sanitary crises, adverse drug reaction reports currently frequently overwhelm pharmacovigilance networks. Artificial intelligence could help support the work of pharmacovigilance experts during such crises, by automatically coding reports, allowing them to prioritise or accelerate their manual assessment. After a previous study showing first results, we developed and compared state-of-the-art machine learning models using a larger nationwide dataset, aiming to automatically pre-code patients’ adverse drug reaction reports. Objectives We aimed to determine the best artificial intelligence model identifying adverse drug reactions and assessing seriousness in patients reports from the French national pharmacovigilance web portal. Methods Reports coded by 27 Pharmacovigilance Centres between March 2017 and December 2020 were selected (n = 11,633). For each report, the Portable Document Format form containing free-text information filled by the patient, and the corresponding encodings of adverse event symptoms (in Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Preferred Terms) and seriousness were obtained. This encoding by experts was used as the reference to train and evaluate models, which contained input data processing and machine-learning natural language processing to learn and predict encodings. We developed and compared different approaches for data processing and classifiers. Performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC), F-measure, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value. We used data from 26 Pharmacovigilance Centres for training and internal validation. External validation was performed using data from the remaining Pharmacovigilance Centres during the same period. Results Internal validation: for adverse drug reaction identification, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) + Light Gradient Boosted Machine (LGBM) achieved an AUC of 0.97 and an F-measure of 0.80. The Cross-lingual Language Model (XLM) [transformer] obtained an AUC of 0.97 and an F-measure of 0.78. For seriousness assessment, FastText + LGBM achieved an AUC of 0.85 and an F-measure of 0.63. CamemBERT (transformer) + Light Gradient Boosted Machine obtained an AUC of 0.84 and an F-measure of 0.63. External validation for both adverse drug reaction identification and seriousness assessment tasks yielded consistent and robust results. Conclusions Our artificial intelligence models showed promising performance to automatically code patient adverse drug reaction reports, with very similar results across approaches. Our system has been deployed by national health authorities in France since January 2021 to facilitate pharmacovigilance of COVID-19 vaccines. Further studies will be needed to validate the performance of the tool in real-life settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillaume L. Martin & Julien Jouganous & Romain Savidan & Axel Bellec & Clément Goehrs & Mehdi Benkebil & Ghada Miremont & Joëlle Micallef & Francesco Salvo & Antoine Pariente & Louis Létinier, 2022. "Validation of Artificial Intelligence to Support the Automatic Coding of Patient Adverse Drug Reaction Reports, Using Nationwide Pharmacovigilance Data," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 535-548, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01153-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-022-01153-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-022-01153-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-022-01153-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01153-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.