IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v45y2022i4d10.1007_s40264-022-01151-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Description of Frequencies of Reported Adverse Events Following Immunization Among Four Different COVID-19 Vaccine Brands

Author

Listed:
  • Agnes Kant

    (Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb)

  • Jurriaan Jansen

    (Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb)

  • Leontine Balveren

    (Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb)

  • Florence Hunsel

    (Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb)

Abstract

Introduction The rapid rollout of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines for a large proportion of the population necessitates a strong emphasis on safety. Complementary to the existing spontaneous reporting system, The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb conducted patient-reported cohort event monitoring (CEM). Objective The primary aim was to investigate differences in the frequencies of any and commonly reported, ‘well-known’, systemic adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) with four COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer’s Comirnaty®, Moderna’s Spikevax®, AstraZeneca’s Vaxzevria® and the Janssen vaccine). As a secondary aim, we analyzed the frequencies of well-known systemic adverse events after the first and, if applicable, second COVID-19 vaccinations, taking into account age, sex and prior COVID-19 infection. Methods Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the Netherlands starting in February 2021 were analyzed using a prospective cohort design. Results Data of 27,554 participants who received one vaccination and 20,682 participants who received complete immunization were analyzed. The percentage of patients reporting any AEFI was high and ranged from approximately 53% for the Pfizer vaccine to approximately 94% for the Moderna vaccine. The frequency of serious AEFIs was low, with the highest frequency found for the AstraZeneca vaccine (0.228%). AEFIs were most often experienced by participants receiving the first dose of the AstraZeneca and Janssen vaccines and the second dose of the Moderna vaccine; the Pfizer vaccine was associated with the lowest rate of AEFIs. Participants with a COVID-19 history before vaccination experienced commonly reported systemic AEFIs more frequently after the first vaccination than after the second vaccination. Women and young people experienced more AEFIs than men and older people, respectively. Conclusions The analysis of a large cohort provides important information about the rates of AEFIs across age groups, among brands of vaccines and between those with and without prior COVID-19 infection. Participants reported a high number of AEFIs in general, but the frequency of serious AEFIs was low.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnes Kant & Jurriaan Jansen & Leontine Balveren & Florence Hunsel, 2022. "Description of Frequencies of Reported Adverse Events Following Immunization Among Four Different COVID-19 Vaccine Brands," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 319-331, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01151-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-022-01151-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-022-01151-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-022-01151-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01151-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.