IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v45y2022i1d10.1007_s40264-021-01127-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

RELAY, Ramucirumab Plus Erlotinib Versus Placebo Plus Erlotinib in Patients with Untreated, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive, Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Safety Profile and Manageability

Author

Listed:
  • Ernest Nadal

    (Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet)

  • Hidehito Horinouchi

    (National Cancer Center Hospital)

  • Jin-Yuan Shih

    (National Taiwan University Hospital)

  • Kazuhiko Nakagawa

    (Kindai University)

  • Martin Reck

    (LungenClinic, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research)

  • Edward B. Garon

    (David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA/Translational Research in Oncology-US Network)

  • Yu-Feng Wei

    (E-Da Cancer Hospital, I-Shou University)

  • Jens Kollmeier

    (Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring)

  • Bente Frimodt-Moller

    (Eli Lilly and Company)

  • Emily Barrett

    (Eli Lilly and Company)

  • Olga Lipkovich

    (Eli Lilly and Company)

  • Carla Visseren-Grul

    (Lilly Oncology)

  • Silvia Novello

    (University of Turin, A.O.U. San Luigi Gonzaga)

Abstract

Introduction RELAY was a global, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study that demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) for ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) versus placebo plus erlotinib (PBO + ERL) in the first-line treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletion or exon 21 (L858R) mutation-positive, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Objective This article provides an in-depth analysis of the safety profile of RAM + ERL versus PBO + ERL observed in RELAY. Methods Eligible patients met these criteria: stage IV NSCLC; EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 substitution (L858R) mutation; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1; and no central nervous system metastases. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive erlotinib 150 mg/day orally plus either ramucirumab 10 mg/kg intravenously or matching placebo once every 2 weeks, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was PFS. Safety was evaluated based on reported treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and clinical laboratory assessments. Results The safety population comprised 446 patients (221 in RAM+ERL arm; 225 in PBO + ERL arm) who received at least one dose of study drug between January 2016 and February 2018. The overall incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs was higher with RAM + ERL than with PBO + ERL, primarily driven by grade 3 hypertension. Grade ≥ 3 dermatitis acneiform and diarrhea were also reported more frequently in the RAM + ERL arm. The increased incidence of AEs with RAM + ERL was easily detected through routine monitoring and managed through dose adjustments and appropriate supportive care. Conclusion This in-depth safety analysis from RELAY supports that RAM + ERL, irrespective of the increased incidence of AEs, does not affect a patient’s ability to benefit from treatment. Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT02411448.

Suggested Citation

  • Ernest Nadal & Hidehito Horinouchi & Jin-Yuan Shih & Kazuhiko Nakagawa & Martin Reck & Edward B. Garon & Yu-Feng Wei & Jens Kollmeier & Bente Frimodt-Moller & Emily Barrett & Olga Lipkovich & Carla Vi, 2022. "RELAY, Ramucirumab Plus Erlotinib Versus Placebo Plus Erlotinib in Patients with Untreated, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive, Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Safety Profile an," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 45-64, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-021-01127-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-021-01127-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-021-01127-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-021-01127-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-021-01127-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.