IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v45y2022i12d10.1007_s40264-022-01237-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detectability of Medication Errors With a STOPP/START-Based Medication Review in Older People Prior to a Potentially Preventable Drug-Related Hospital Admission

Author

Listed:
  • Bastiaan T. G. M. Sallevelt

    (Utrecht University)

  • Toine C. G. Egberts

    (Utrecht University
    Utrecht University)

  • Corlina J. A. Huibers

    (Utrecht University)

  • Jimmy Ietswaart

    (Utrecht University)

  • A. Clara Drenth-van Maanen

    (Utrecht University)

  • Emma Jennings

    (University College Cork)

  • Cian O’Mahony

    (University College Cork)

  • Katharina Tabea Jungo

    (University of Bern)

  • Martin Feller

    (University of Bern
    University of Bern)

  • Nicolas Rodondi

    (University of Bern
    University of Bern)

  • François-Xavier Sibille

    (Université catholique de Louvain
    CHU UCL Namur)

  • Anne Spinewine

    (Université catholique de Louvain
    CHU UCL Namur)

  • Eugène P. Puijenbroek

    (The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb
    University of Groningen)

  • Ingeborg Wilting

    (Utrecht University)

  • Wilma Knol

    (Utrecht University)

Abstract

Introduction Multimorbidity and polypharmacy are risk factors for drug-related hospital admissions (DRAs) in the ageing population. DRAs caused by medication errors (MEs) are considered potentially preventable. The STOPP/START criteria were developed to detect potential MEs in older people. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the detectability of MEs with a STOPP/START-based in-hospital medication review in older people with polypharmacy and multimorbidity prior to a potentially preventable DRA. Methods Hospitalised older patients (n = 963) with polypharmacy and multimorbidity from the intervention arm of the OPERAM trial received a STOPP/START-based in-hospital medication review by a pharmacotherapy team. Readmissions within 1 year after the in-hospital medication review were adjudicated for drug-relatedness. A retrospective assessment was performed to determine whether MEs identified at the first DRA were detectable during the in-hospital medication review. Results In total, 84 of 963 OPERAM intervention patients (8.7%) were readmitted with a potentially preventable DRA, of which 72 patients (n = 77 MEs) were eligible for analysis. About half (48%, n = 37/77) of the MEs were not present during the in-hospital medication review and therefore were not detectable at that time. The pharmacotherapy team recommended a change in medication regimen in 50% (n = 20/40) of present MEs, which corresponds to 26% (n = 20/77) of the total identified MEs at readmission. However, these recommendations were not implemented. Conclusion MEs identified at readmission were not addressed by a prior single in-hospital medication review because either these MEs occurred after the medication review (~50%), or no recommendation was given during the medication review (~25%), or the recommendation was not implemented (~25%). Future research should focus on optimisation of the timing and frequency of medication review and the implementation of proposed medication recommendations. Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02986425. December 8, 2016. Funding European Union HORIZON 2020, Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI), Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) Graphical abstract

Suggested Citation

  • Bastiaan T. G. M. Sallevelt & Toine C. G. Egberts & Corlina J. A. Huibers & Jimmy Ietswaart & A. Clara Drenth-van Maanen & Emma Jennings & Cian O’Mahony & Katharina Tabea Jungo & Martin Feller & Nicol, 2022. "Detectability of Medication Errors With a STOPP/START-Based Medication Review in Older People Prior to a Potentially Preventable Drug-Related Hospital Admission," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 45(12), pages 1501-1516, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:12:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01237-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-022-01237-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-022-01237-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-022-01237-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:12:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01237-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.