IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v45y2022i10d10.1007_s40264-022-01226-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Prospective Observational Study on BBV152 Coronavirus Vaccine Use in Adolescents and Comparison with Adults: Interim Results of the First Real-World Safety Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Upinder Kaur

    (Banaras Hindu University)

  • Anju K.L

    (Banaras Hindu University)

  • Mayank Chauhan

    (Banaras Hindu University)

  • Aditi Joshi

    (Banaras Hindu University)

  • Agniva Das

    (Banaras Hindu University)

  • Sangeeta Kansal

    (Banaras Hindu University)

  • Vaibhav Jaisawal

    (Banaras Hindu University)

  • Kishor Patwardhan

    (Banaras Hindu University)

  • Sankha Shubhra Chakrabarti

    (Banaras Hindu University)

Abstract

Introduction The BBV152 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine (COVAXIN) has recently been approved for adolescents. Objective We provide the first real-world safety data of COVAXIN use in adolescents and compare with adults. Methods A prospective observational study was initiated in January 2022. Enrolled adolescents and adults were contacted by telephone after 14 days of receiving the BBV152 vaccine. The primary outcome was vaccine safety assessed as rate of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs). Severity grading of AEFIs was done using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) scale. Interim results are presented. Results A total of 698 adolescents and 326 adults were enrolled. AEFIs after the first dose developed in 243 out of 670 adolescents (36.3%), with 21% reporting only local AEFIs and 15.2% reporting systemic AEFIs. Among 340 adolescents who had received the second dose of vaccine, 129 (37.9%) developed AEFIs, with only local involvement in 20.3% and systemic involvement in 17.6%. Injection site pain and fever were the common AEFIs. The majority of AEFIs were mild-moderate. Nearly 0.9% of adolescents receiving the first dose reported severe AEFIs. Atypical AEFIs were observed in 0.6–0.9% of adolescents. The majority of the AEFIs resolved in 1–2 days. AEFIs were persistent in > 2% of adolescents at day 14 after the second dose, and also in 3.7% of adults overall at follow-up. No difference was observed in AEFI incidence and patterns between adolescents and adults. Regression analysis showed females and those with a history of allergy to be, respectively, at 1.6 times and 3 times increased risk of AEFIs among adolescents. Conclusions COVAXIN carries an overall favorable short-term safety profile in adolescents. The observed AEFI rates in adolescents are much lower than that reported with mRNA vaccines, but head–head comparisons in the same population are required to generate relative vaccine safety data. Female adolescents and those with a history of allergy need watchfulness for severe and persistent AEFIs. With some AEFIs persisting at 14 days, a longer follow-up is recommended to strengthen the safety data of COVAXIN.

Suggested Citation

  • Upinder Kaur & Anju K.L & Mayank Chauhan & Aditi Joshi & Agniva Das & Sangeeta Kansal & Vaibhav Jaisawal & Kishor Patwardhan & Sankha Shubhra Chakrabarti, 2022. "A Prospective Observational Study on BBV152 Coronavirus Vaccine Use in Adolescents and Comparison with Adults: Interim Results of the First Real-World Safety Analysis," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 45(10), pages 1099-1109, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01226-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-022-01226-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-022-01226-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-022-01226-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01226-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.