IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v45y2022i10d10.1007_s40264-022-01220-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Vaccine Hesitancy on Onset, Severity and Type of Self-reported Adverse Events: A French Cross-Sectional Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Khouri

    (Grenoble Alpes University Hospital
    Grenoble Alpes University)

  • Ayoub Larabi

    (Grenoble Alpes University Hospital)

  • Pierre Verger

    (VITROME (Aix Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, SSA)
    Observatoire régional de la santé PACA (ORS Paca), Aix-Marseille Université
    Inserm, F-CRIN, I-REIVAC/COVIREIVAC)

  • Fatima Gauna

    (Observatoire régional de la santé PACA (ORS Paca), Aix-Marseille Université)

  • Jean-Luc Cracowski

    (Grenoble Alpes University Hospital
    Grenoble Alpes University)

  • Jeremy Ward

    (VITROME (Aix Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, SSA)
    CERMES3 (INSERM, CNRS, EHESS, Université de Paris))

Abstract

Introduction Little is known about the impact of mandatory vaccination on people who are reluctant to be vaccinated, despite the potential importance in terms of public health policy. Objective We aimed to explore the relationship between vaccine hesitancy and onset, severity and characteristics of self-reported adverse events. Methods We used a cross-sectional online survey conducted in 2021 among a representative sample of the French population aged 18 years and older (n = 1593). All reported adverse events were analyzed and categorized by trained experts in drug safety and pharmacovigilance. Multivariate binomial regressions on the onset of self-reported adverse events, vaccine hesitancy categories and predefined responders’ characteristics were performed. Results Overall, 590 (37.0%) participants reported at least one adverse event, with 121 (20.5%) considered it to be severe. Proportions of reported adverse events, ranging from 18% (in non-reluctant responders) to 65% (in very reluctant responders), and their severity, ranging from 5% (non-reluctant responders) to 41% (very reluctant responders), depended highly on attitudes toward vaccination. The adverse events profile remained similar between groups. In the multivariate regression model, beyond attitude toward vaccination, younger age and female gender were significantly associated with higher reporting of vaccine adverse events. Conclusions Our results suggest that vaccine hesitancy could be a major driver of patient-reported vaccine-related adverse events and their perceived severity. In this context, vaccinators must pay special attention to reluctant patients and inform them on the possible nocebo nature of these adverse events so as to prevent them.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Khouri & Ayoub Larabi & Pierre Verger & Fatima Gauna & Jean-Luc Cracowski & Jeremy Ward, 2022. "Impact of Vaccine Hesitancy on Onset, Severity and Type of Self-reported Adverse Events: A French Cross-Sectional Survey," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 45(10), pages 1049-1056, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01220-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-022-01220-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-022-01220-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-022-01220-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01220-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.