IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v44y2021i9d10.1007_s40264-021-01086-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Cardiotoxicity: An Analysis of Spontaneous Reports in Eudravigilance

Author

Listed:
  • Annamaria Mascolo

    (Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology
    “L. Donatelli”, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”)

  • Cristina Scavone

    (Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology
    “L. Donatelli”, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”)

  • Carmen Ferrajolo

    (Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology
    “L. Donatelli”, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”)

  • Concetta Rafaniello

    (Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology
    “L. Donatelli”, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”)

  • Romano Danesi

    (University Hospital of Pisa)

  • Marzia Re

    (University Hospital of Pisa)

  • Antonio Russo

    (A.O.U.P. “P. Giaccone”, University Hospital Palermo)

  • Enrico Coscioni

    (AGENAS-Agenzia Nazionale per i Servizi Sanitari Regionali)

  • Francesco Rossi

    (Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology
    “L. Donatelli”, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”)

  • Roberto Alfano

    (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”)

  • Annalisa Capuano

    (Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology
    “L. Donatelli”, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”)

Abstract

Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in the treatment of many cancers as they improve clinical outcomes. However, ICIs have also been associated with the development of immune-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Among immune-related ADRs, cardiac immune-related ADRs are rare, but also associated with high mortality rates. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of cardiac ADRs reported with ICIs in the European spontaneous reporting system. Methods We retrieved individual case safety reports on ICI-induced cardiac ADRs from the website of suspected ADR ( www.adrreports.eu ) of the European pharmacovigilance database (Eudravigilance). Data were retrieved from the date of marketing authorization of each ICI (ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, avelumab, and cemiplimab) to 14 March, 2020. The reporting odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval were computed to assess the reporting frequency of cardiac ADRs for each ICI compared to all other ICIs. Results A total of 2478 individual case safety reports with at least one ICI as the suspected drug were retrieved from Eudravigilance, of which 249 (10%) reported more than one ICI. The three most reported ICIs were nivolumab (43.2%), pembrolizumab (32.5%), and the association of nivolumab/ipilimumab (9.4%). A total of 3388 cardiac ADRs were identified. Cardiac ADRs were serious (99.4%) and had a fatal outcome (30.1%). The most reported cardiac events were myocarditis, cardiac failure, atrial fibrillation, pericardial effusion, and myocardial infarction. Nivolumab was reported with a small increased reporting frequency of individual case safety reports with cardiac ADRs compared to all other ICIs (reporting odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.01–1.18). Conclusions Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced cardiac ADRs were serious and had unfavorable outcomes. In our study, nivolumab was the only ICI with a small increased reporting frequency of individual case safety reports with cardiac ADRs compared to all other ICIs. In this regard, further head-to-head studies are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Annamaria Mascolo & Cristina Scavone & Carmen Ferrajolo & Concetta Rafaniello & Romano Danesi & Marzia Re & Antonio Russo & Enrico Coscioni & Francesco Rossi & Roberto Alfano & Annalisa Capuano, 2021. "Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Cardiotoxicity: An Analysis of Spontaneous Reports in Eudravigilance," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 44(9), pages 957-971, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:44:y:2021:i:9:d:10.1007_s40264-021-01086-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-021-01086-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-021-01086-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-021-01086-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:44:y:2021:i:9:d:10.1007_s40264-021-01086-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.