IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v44y2021i7d10.1007_s40264-021-01076-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety Profile of the Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Immunocompromised Populations: An Overview of Six Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Marta López-Fauqued

    (GSK)

  • Maribel Co-van der Mee

    (GSK)

  • Adriana Bastidas

    (GSK
    Current affiliation: Mithra Pharmaceuticals)

  • Pierre Beukelaers

    (GSK)

  • Alemnew F. Dagnew

    (GSK
    Bill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute)

  • Juan Jose Fernandez Garcia

    (GSK)

  • Anne Schuind

    (GSK
    PATH)

  • Fernanda Tavares-da-Silva

    (GSK)

Abstract

Introduction The adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) has demonstrated high efficacy against herpes zoster in older adults and immunocompromised populations. We present comprehensive safety data from six clinical trials in immunocompromised populations (autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant and renal transplant recipients, patients with hematologic malignancies, patients with solid tumors, and human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults) who are at an increased risk of herpes zoster. Methods In all trials, immunocompromised adults ≥ 18 years of age were administered RZV or placebo. Safety was evaluated in the total vaccinated cohort. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were collected for 7 days and unsolicited AEs for 30 days after each dose. Serious AEs, fatal serious AEs, and potential immune-mediated diseases were collected from dose 1 until 12 months post-last dose or study end. Data were pooled for solicited AEs; unsolicited AEs, (fatal) serious AEs, and potential immune-mediated diseases were analyzed for each individual trial. All AEs were analyzed for sub-strata of adults 18–49 years of age and ≥ 50 years of age. Results In total, 1587 (RZV) and 1529 (placebo) adults were included in the pooled total vaccinated cohort. Solicited AEs were more common after RZV than placebo, were generally more common in the younger age stratum, and were mostly mild to moderate and resolved within 3 days (median duration). Unsolicited AEs and serious AEs were in line with underlying diseases and therapies. Across studies, the percentage of adults reporting one or more unsolicited AE was comparable between RZV and placebo, irrespective of age stratum. The percentage of adults reporting one or more serious AE, fatal serious AE, or potential immune-mediated diseases was generally similar for RZV and placebo, irrespective of age stratum. Overall, no safety concerns were identified. Conclusions Recombinant zoster vaccine has a clinically acceptable safety profile. With the previously published vaccine efficacy and immunogenicity results, these data support a favorable benefit-risk profile of RZV vaccination in immunocompromised populations who are at an increased risk of herpes zoster.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta López-Fauqued & Maribel Co-van der Mee & Adriana Bastidas & Pierre Beukelaers & Alemnew F. Dagnew & Juan Jose Fernandez Garcia & Anne Schuind & Fernanda Tavares-da-Silva, 2021. "Safety Profile of the Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Immunocompromised Populations: An Overview of Six Trials," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 44(7), pages 811-823, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:44:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s40264-021-01076-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-021-01076-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-021-01076-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-021-01076-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:44:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s40264-021-01076-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.