IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v44y2021i5d10.1007_s40264-021-01043-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anticholinergic Activity of Psychotropic Drugs and Cognitive Impairment Among Participants Aged 45 and Over: The CONSTANCES Study

Author

Listed:
  • Abdelkrim Ziad

    (ClinSearch-110
    Population-based Epidemiological Cohorts Unit, US 011 Inserm)

  • Claudine Berr

    (INSERM, University of Montpellier, U1061, Neuropsychiatry: Epidemiological and Clinical Research)

  • Fabrice Ruiz

    (ClinSearch-110)

  • Bernard Bégaud

    (INSERM, U1219-Pharmacoepidemiology, Bordeaux University)

  • Cédric Lemogne

    (Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, UFR de Médecine
    Université de Paris, AP-HP, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, DMU Psychiatrie et Addictologie, Service de Psychiatrie de l’adulte, INSERM, Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris (IPNP), UMR_S1266)

  • Marcel Goldberg

    (Population-based Epidemiological Cohorts Unit, US 011 Inserm)

  • Marie Zins

    (Population-based Epidemiological Cohorts Unit, US 011 Inserm
    Université de Paris, AP-HP, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, DMU Psychiatrie et Addictologie, Service de Psychiatrie de l’adulte, INSERM, Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris (IPNP), UMR_S1266)

  • Thibault Mura

    (INSERM, University of Montpellier, U1061, Neuropsychiatry: Epidemiological and Clinical Research
    Nîmes University Hospital)

Abstract

Introduction Psychotropic drugs such as anxiolytics, antidepressants and antipsychotics may have anticholinergic properties that could directly affect patients’ cognition. Objectives Our objective was to assess the relationship between exposure to anticholinergic-positive (AC+) psychotropic drugs and cognitive impairment compared with psychotropic drugs without anticholinergic activity (AC−). Methods This analysis included participants (aged 45–70 years) enrolled between January 2012 and October 2017 in the CONSTANCES cohort treated with psychotropic drugs (antidepressants n = 2602, anxiolytics n = 1195, antipsychotics n = 197) in the 3 years preceding cognitive assessment. Within each drug class, the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale was used to classify drugs as either AC+ or AC−. Cognitive impairment was defined as a score below − 1 standard deviation from the standardized mean of the neuropsychological score. We used multiple logistic regression models and matching on propensity score to estimate the relationship between anticholinergic activity and cognitive impairment. Results Our analyses did not show any increased risk of cognitive impairment for AC+ antidepressants and anxiolytics, with the exception of a slight increase for AC+ antidepressants in episodic memory (odds ratio [OR] 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–1.36). Conversely, we found a more marked increase in risk with AC+ antipsychotics on executive function (Trail Making Test-A [TMT-A], OR 4.49 [95% CI 2.59–7.97] and TMT-B, OR 3.62 [95% CI 2.25–5.89]). Conclusion Our results suggest there is no clinically relevant association between the anticholinergic activity of antidepressant and anxiolytic drugs and cognitive impairment in middle-aged adults. An association could exist between AC+ antipsychotics and executive function.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdelkrim Ziad & Claudine Berr & Fabrice Ruiz & Bernard Bégaud & Cédric Lemogne & Marcel Goldberg & Marie Zins & Thibault Mura, 2021. "Anticholinergic Activity of Psychotropic Drugs and Cognitive Impairment Among Participants Aged 45 and Over: The CONSTANCES Study," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 565-579, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:44:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s40264-021-01043-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-021-01043-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-021-01043-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-021-01043-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:44:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s40264-021-01043-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.