IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v44y2021i4d10.1007_s40264-020-01041-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety of As-Needed Budesonide-Formoterol in Mild Asthma: Data from the Two Phase III SYGMA Studies

Author

Listed:
  • J. Mark FitzGerald

    (University of British Columbia)

  • Paul M. O’Byrne

    (McMaster University)

  • Eric D. Bateman

    (University of Cape Town)

  • Peter J. Barnes

    (Imperial College)

  • Jinping Zheng

    (Guangzhou Medical University)

  • Stefan Ivanov

    (AstraZeneca)

  • Rosa Lamarca

    (AstraZeneca)

  • Ulrika Larsdotter

    (AstraZeneca)

  • Ulrika Emerath

    (AstraZeneca)

  • Gerreke Jansen

    (AstraZeneca)

  • Margareta Puu

    (AstraZeneca)

  • Vijay K. T. Alagappan

    (AstraZeneca)

  • Filip Surmont

    (AstraZeneca)

  • Helen K. Reddel

    (University of Sydney)

Abstract

Introduction Budesonide-formoterol taken as needed is an emerging treatment for mild asthma. Objective We used data from the SYGMA studies to assess the safety of As-needed budesonide-formoterol compared with As-needed terbutaline and compared with maintenance budesonide. Methods SYGMA 1 and 2 were 52-week, double-blind, parallel-group studies in patients aged ≥ 12 years with physician-assessed mild asthma. Patients were randomized to As-needed budesonide-formoterol 200/6 μg, twice-daily budesonide 200 μg as maintenance plus As-needed terbutaline 0.5 mg, and As-needed terbutaline 0.5 mg (SYGMA 1 only). Adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), discontinuations due to AEs (DAEs), and study-defined asthma-related discontinuations from corresponding treatment groups in both studies were pooled. SYGMA 1 data were used for comparisons with As-needed terbutaline alone. Results The pooled analysis included 3366 patients in the As-needed budesonide-formoterol group and 3369 in the budesonide maintenance group, with AEs in 40.8% and 42.5% of patients, respectively. Common AEs included viral upper respiratory tract infection (viral URTI) and URTI. SAE, DAE, and asthma-related discontinuation rates were similar with As-needed budesonide-formoterol and maintenance budesonide. Potential local and systemic corticosteroid class effects were reported in ≤ 1% of patients for each budesonide-containing regimen. In SYGMA 1, AEs were more common in the As-needed terbutaline (n = 1277) than As-needed budesonide-formoterol (n = 1277) groups (42.7 vs. 38.0%), as were DAEs (2.9 vs. 0.8%) and asthma-related discontinuations (1.6 vs. 0.3%). Conclusions Budesonide-formoterol anti-inflammatory reliever therapy is generally well-tolerated in patients with mild asthma and has a safety profile similar to that of daily budesonide. No new safety signals were identified. ClinicalTrial.gov Identifiers NCT02149199 (SYGMA 1) and NCT02224157 (SYGMA 2).

Suggested Citation

  • J. Mark FitzGerald & Paul M. O’Byrne & Eric D. Bateman & Peter J. Barnes & Jinping Zheng & Stefan Ivanov & Rosa Lamarca & Ulrika Larsdotter & Ulrika Emerath & Gerreke Jansen & Margareta Puu & Vijay K., 2021. "Safety of As-Needed Budesonide-Formoterol in Mild Asthma: Data from the Two Phase III SYGMA Studies," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 467-478, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:44:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s40264-020-01041-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-01041-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-020-01041-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-020-01041-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:44:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s40264-020-01041-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.