IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v44y2021i2d10.1007_s40264-020-01012-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Real-World Data on Nonmedical Use of Tramadol from Patients Evaluated for Substance Abuse Treatment in the NAVIPPRO Addiction Severity Index—Multimedia Version (ASI-MV®) Network

Author

Listed:
  • Jody L. Green

    (Inflexxion, A Division of Integrated Behavioral Health)

  • Taryn Dailey-Govoni

    (Inflexxion, A Division of Integrated Behavioral Health)

  • Stephen F. Butler

    (Inflexxion, A Division of Integrated Behavioral Health)

Abstract

Introduction Drug safety studies regarding comparative risk of different opioid compounds are important as providers and regulatory agencies in the United States continue to balance pain management with an ongoing opioid epidemic. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate nonmedical use (NMU) and diversion of tramadol and comparator opioids using real-world data from the Addiction Severity Index—Multimedia Version (ASI-MV®). Methods A cross-sectional study design was used to evaluate past 30-day tramadol and comparator opioid NMU among adults assessed for substance abuse treatment using the ASI-MV from 2010 to 2018. Population and drug utilization-adjusted rates were studied, as well as patient characteristics, route of administration, and diversion. Results Past 30-day NMU of one or more prescription opioid was reported in 125,048 (22.6%) of ASI-MV assessments (2010–2018); 46.5% reported oxycodone, 43.2% hydrocodone, 8.1% morphine, and 7.2% tramadol. Male respondents ranged from 43.2% in the tramadol group to 51.8% in the oxycodone group. Majority (~ 76%) were Caucasian in all groups, with 86.9% Caucasian in the morphine group. Prevalence of past 30-day tramadol NMU was significantly lower than that of morphine, oxycodone, and hydrocodone for both population and utilization-adjusted rates. Rate of snorting of tramadol was 4–7 times lower than comparator opioids and injection was 14–34 times lower than morphine and oxycodone. Tramadol was most likely to be obtained via the patient’s own prescription while the comparator opioids were more often obtained via dealers or family/friends. Conclusion Tramadol had a significantly lower rate of NMU than comparator opioids and was less likely to be diverted or used via higher-risk non-oral routes. These findings support previous evaluations by WHO and the United States Drug Enforcement Agency that concluded that tramadol has a low potential for abuse.

Suggested Citation

  • Jody L. Green & Taryn Dailey-Govoni & Stephen F. Butler, 2021. "Real-World Data on Nonmedical Use of Tramadol from Patients Evaluated for Substance Abuse Treatment in the NAVIPPRO Addiction Severity Index—Multimedia Version (ASI-MV®) Network," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 235-244, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:44:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s40264-020-01012-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-01012-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-020-01012-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-020-01012-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David L. Murphy & Jacob A. Lebin & Stevan G. Severtson & Heather A. Olsen & Nabarun Dasgupta & Richard C. Dart, 2018. "Comparative Rates of Mortality and Serious Adverse Effects Among Commonly Prescribed Opioid Analgesics," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 41(8), pages 787-795, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:44:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s40264-020-01012-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.